Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery

Objectives: To determine whether the use of ultrasound can reduce the incidence of incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position at instrumental delivery and subsequent morbidity. Design: Two-arm, parallel, randomised trial, conducted from June 2011 to December 2012. Setting: Two maternity ho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramphul, Meenakshi, Ooi, Poh Vei, Burke, Gerard, Kennelly, Mairead M., Said, Soha A.T., Montgomery, Alan A., Murphy, Deidre J.
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/48300/
Description
Summary:Objectives: To determine whether the use of ultrasound can reduce the incidence of incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position at instrumental delivery and subsequent morbidity. Design: Two-arm, parallel, randomised trial, conducted from June 2011 to December 2012. Setting: Two maternity hospitals in the Republic of Ireland. Sample: 514 nulliparous women at term (≥37 weeks' gestation) with singleton cephalic pregnancies, aiming to deliver vaginally were recruited prior to induction of labour or in early labour. Methods: If instrumental delivery was required, women who had provided written consent were randomised to receive clinical assessment (standard care) or ultrasound scan and ultrasound assessment (ultrasound). Main outcome: Incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position. Results: The incidence of incorrect diagnosis was significantly lower in the ultrasound group than the standard care group (4/257, 1.6% versus 52/257, 20.2%, odds ratio 0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.19, p value <0.001). The decision to delivery interval was similar in both groups (ultrasound mean 13.8 minutes, SD 8.7, versus standard care mean 14.6 minutes, SD 10.1, p value 0.35). The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications,4 failed instrumental delivery and caesarean section was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: An ultrasound assessment prior to instrumental delivery reduced the incidence of incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position without delaying delivery but did not prevent morbidity. A more integrated clinical skills-based approach is likely to be required to prevent adverse outcomes at instrumental delivery.