14. Recovery: the business case
This paper makes the Business Case for supporting recovery. We believe that this should be informed by three types of data: evaluative research (such as randomised controlled trials); the perceived benefits for service users – what might be termed ‘customer satisfaction’; and best evidence about val...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Other |
| Published: |
ImROC
2017
|
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47660/ |
| _version_ | 1848797599540183040 |
|---|---|
| author | Slade, Mike McDaid, David Shepherd, Geoff Williams, Sue Repper, Julie |
| author_facet | Slade, Mike McDaid, David Shepherd, Geoff Williams, Sue Repper, Julie |
| author_sort | Slade, Mike |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This paper makes the Business Case for supporting recovery. We believe that this should be informed by three types of data: evaluative research (such as randomised controlled trials); the perceived benefits for service users – what might be termed ‘customer satisfaction’; and best evidence about value for money.
Some of the ImROC 10 key challenges have a very strong research base. For example, there is substantially more randomised controlled trial evidence supporting the value of peer support workers (challenge 8) than exists for any other mental health professional group, or service model.
Similarly, the scientific evidence for supporting self-management (challenge 1) is compelling. Other challenges have a strong evidence base indicating that they improve people’s experience of services. The positive experiences of students at Recovery Colleges (challenge 3) and the beneficial impact on experience of more involvement in safety planning (challenge 6) are clear. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:06:26Z |
| format | Other |
| id | nottingham-47660 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T20:06:26Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | ImROC |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-476602020-05-04T19:14:16Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47660/ 14. Recovery: the business case Slade, Mike McDaid, David Shepherd, Geoff Williams, Sue Repper, Julie This paper makes the Business Case for supporting recovery. We believe that this should be informed by three types of data: evaluative research (such as randomised controlled trials); the perceived benefits for service users – what might be termed ‘customer satisfaction’; and best evidence about value for money. Some of the ImROC 10 key challenges have a very strong research base. For example, there is substantially more randomised controlled trial evidence supporting the value of peer support workers (challenge 8) than exists for any other mental health professional group, or service model. Similarly, the scientific evidence for supporting self-management (challenge 1) is compelling. Other challenges have a strong evidence base indicating that they improve people’s experience of services. The positive experiences of students at Recovery Colleges (challenge 3) and the beneficial impact on experience of more involvement in safety planning (challenge 6) are clear. ImROC 2017-10-27 Other NonPeerReviewed Slade, Mike, McDaid, David, Shepherd, Geoff, Williams, Sue and Repper, Julie (2017) 14. Recovery: the business case. ImROC, Nottingham. https://imroc.org/resources/14-recovery-business-case/ |
| spellingShingle | Slade, Mike McDaid, David Shepherd, Geoff Williams, Sue Repper, Julie 14. Recovery: the business case |
| title | 14. Recovery: the business case |
| title_full | 14. Recovery: the business case |
| title_fullStr | 14. Recovery: the business case |
| title_full_unstemmed | 14. Recovery: the business case |
| title_short | 14. Recovery: the business case |
| title_sort | 14. recovery: the business case |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47660/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47660/ |