Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study

Study question: Is it possible to develop and externally validate risk prediction equations to estimate the 10 year risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes aged 25-84 years? Methods: This was a prospective cohort study using routinely collected data from general prac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hippisley-Cox, Julia, Coupland, Carol
Format: Article
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47612/
_version_ 1848797588412694528
author Hippisley-Cox, Julia
Coupland, Carol
author_facet Hippisley-Cox, Julia
Coupland, Carol
author_sort Hippisley-Cox, Julia
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Study question: Is it possible to develop and externally validate risk prediction equations to estimate the 10 year risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes aged 25-84 years? Methods: This was a prospective cohort study using routinely collected data from general practices in England contributing to the QResearch and Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) databases during the study period 1998-2014. The equations were developed using 763 QResearch practices (n=454 575 patients with diabetes) and validated in 254 different QResearch practices (n=142 419) and 357 CPRD practices (n=206 050). Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive separate risk equations for blindness and amputation in men and women that could be evaluated at 10 years. Measures of calibration and discrimination were calculated in the two validation cohorts. Study answer and limitations: Risk prediction equations to quantify absolute risk of blindness and amputation in men and women with diabetes have been developed and externally validated. In the QResearch derivation cohort, 4822 new cases of lower limb amputation and 8063 new cases of blindness occurred during follow-up. The risk equations were well calibrated in both validation cohorts. Discrimination was good in men in the external CPRD cohort for amputation (D statistic 1.69, Harrell’s C statistic 0.77) and blindness (D statistic 1.40, Harrell’s C statistic 0.73), with similar results in women and in the QResearch validation cohort. The algorithms are based on variables that patients are likely to know or that are routinely recorded in general practice computer systems. They can be used to identify patients at high risk for prevention or further assessment. Limitations include lack of formally adjudicated outcomes, information bias, and missing data. What this study adds: Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of blindness and amputation but generally do not have accurate assessments of the magnitude of their individual risks. The new algorithms calculate the absolute risk of developing these complications over a 10 year period in patients with diabetes, taking account of their individual risk factors.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:06:16Z
format Article
id nottingham-47612
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:06:16Z
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-476122020-05-04T17:23:47Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47612/ Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study Hippisley-Cox, Julia Coupland, Carol Study question: Is it possible to develop and externally validate risk prediction equations to estimate the 10 year risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes aged 25-84 years? Methods: This was a prospective cohort study using routinely collected data from general practices in England contributing to the QResearch and Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) databases during the study period 1998-2014. The equations were developed using 763 QResearch practices (n=454 575 patients with diabetes) and validated in 254 different QResearch practices (n=142 419) and 357 CPRD practices (n=206 050). Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive separate risk equations for blindness and amputation in men and women that could be evaluated at 10 years. Measures of calibration and discrimination were calculated in the two validation cohorts. Study answer and limitations: Risk prediction equations to quantify absolute risk of blindness and amputation in men and women with diabetes have been developed and externally validated. In the QResearch derivation cohort, 4822 new cases of lower limb amputation and 8063 new cases of blindness occurred during follow-up. The risk equations were well calibrated in both validation cohorts. Discrimination was good in men in the external CPRD cohort for amputation (D statistic 1.69, Harrell’s C statistic 0.77) and blindness (D statistic 1.40, Harrell’s C statistic 0.73), with similar results in women and in the QResearch validation cohort. The algorithms are based on variables that patients are likely to know or that are routinely recorded in general practice computer systems. They can be used to identify patients at high risk for prevention or further assessment. Limitations include lack of formally adjudicated outcomes, information bias, and missing data. What this study adds: Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of blindness and amputation but generally do not have accurate assessments of the magnitude of their individual risks. The new algorithms calculate the absolute risk of developing these complications over a 10 year period in patients with diabetes, taking account of their individual risk factors. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-11-11 Article PeerReviewed Hippisley-Cox, Julia and Coupland, Carol (2015) Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study. BMJ, 351 . h5441/1-h5441/11. ISSN 1756-1833 Development and validation; Risk prediction Equations; Blindness; Lower limb amputation; Diabetes; Primary care; Database research; QResearch; Clinical Practice Research Datalink http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h5441 doi:10.1136/bmj.h5441 doi:10.1136/bmj.h5441
spellingShingle Development and validation; Risk prediction Equations; Blindness; Lower limb amputation; Diabetes; Primary care; Database research; QResearch; Clinical Practice Research Datalink
Hippisley-Cox, Julia
Coupland, Carol
Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study
title Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study
title_full Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study
title_fullStr Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study
title_short Development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study
title_sort development and validation of risk prediction equations to estimate future risk of blindness and lower limb amputation in patients with diabetes: cohort study
topic Development and validation; Risk prediction Equations; Blindness; Lower limb amputation; Diabetes; Primary care; Database research; QResearch; Clinical Practice Research Datalink
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47612/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47612/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/47612/