An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures

This article studies the development and current practice of the European Court of Human Rights when it indicates non-financial remedial measures following the determination that violations of the European Convention on Human Rights have occurred. Analyses of the jurisprudence and statistical data d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mowbray, Alastair
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46513/
_version_ 1848797344905035776
author Mowbray, Alastair
author_facet Mowbray, Alastair
author_sort Mowbray, Alastair
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This article studies the development and current practice of the European Court of Human Rights when it indicates non-financial remedial measures following the determination that violations of the European Convention on Human Rights have occurred. Analyses of the jurisprudence and statistical data derived from the Committee of Ministers’ supervisory reports are used to explain, inter alia, the types of remedial measures indicated, the reasons justifying the Court indicating such measures (in the text and operative parts of judgments) and the challenges facing the Court resorting to ‘Article 46 judgments’.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:02:24Z
format Article
id nottingham-46513
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:02:24Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-465132020-05-04T19:03:38Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46513/ An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures Mowbray, Alastair This article studies the development and current practice of the European Court of Human Rights when it indicates non-financial remedial measures following the determination that violations of the European Convention on Human Rights have occurred. Analyses of the jurisprudence and statistical data derived from the Committee of Ministers’ supervisory reports are used to explain, inter alia, the types of remedial measures indicated, the reasons justifying the Court indicating such measures (in the text and operative parts of judgments) and the challenges facing the Court resorting to ‘Article 46 judgments’. Oxford University Press 2017-09-01 Article PeerReviewed Mowbray, Alastair (2017) An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures. Human Rights Law Review, 17 (3). pp. 451-478. ISSN 1744-1021 international human rights judicial remedies non-financial remedies European Court of Human Rights https://academic.oup.com/hrlr/article-abstract/17/3/451/3977761/An-Examination-of-the-European-Court-of-Human doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngx015 doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngx015
spellingShingle international human rights
judicial remedies
non-financial remedies
European Court of Human Rights
Mowbray, Alastair
An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures
title An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures
title_full An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures
title_fullStr An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures
title_full_unstemmed An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures
title_short An examination of the European Court of Human Rights' indication of remedial measures
title_sort examination of the european court of human rights' indication of remedial measures
topic international human rights
judicial remedies
non-financial remedies
European Court of Human Rights
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46513/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46513/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46513/