| Summary: | Background:
Patient-reported outcome measures are rarely used in vitiligo trials. The Vitiligo Noticeability Scale (VNS) is a new patient-reported outcome measure assessing how ‘noticeable’ the vitiligo patches are after treatment. The noticeability of vitiligo after treatment is an important indicator of treatment success from the patient’s perspective.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity, acceptability and interpretability of the VNS. Our main hypothesis was that the VNS would be a better and more consistent indicator of treatment success than percentage repigmentation.
Methods:
Clinicians (n=33) and patients with vitiligo (n=101) examined 39 image pairs, each depicting a vitiligo lesion pre- and post-treatment. Using an online questionnaire, respondents gave a global assessment of treatment success and a VNS score for treatment response. Clinicians also estimated percentage repigmentation of lesions (<25; 25-50; 51-75; >75). Treatment success was defined as ‘Yes’ on global assessment, a VNS score of 4 or 5, and more than 75% repigmentation. Agreement between respondents and the different scales was assessed using kappa statistics.
Results:
VNS scores were associated with both patient- and clinician-reported global treatment success (κ = 0.54 and κ = 0.47, respectively). Percentage repigmentation showed a weaker association with patient- and clinician-reported global treatment success (κ = 0.39 and κ = 0.29, respectively). VNS scores of 4 or 5 can be interpreted as representing treatment success. Images depicting post-treatment hyperpigmentation were less likely to be rated as successful.
Conclusions:
The VNS is a valid patient-reported measure of vitiligo treatment success. Further validation of the VNS is required, using larger sets of clinical pre- and post-treatment images, affecting a wider range of anatomical sites.
|
|---|