“Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour

This paper considers an oft-criticised passage of John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women, arguing that Mill’s position is misunderstood. In this passage, Mill identifies a trilemma facing women in non-ideal circumstances. Two elements of this can be satisfied, but not all three, so long as men...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McCabe, Helen
Format: Article
Published: Imprint Academic 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46386/
_version_ 1848797315659202560
author McCabe, Helen
author_facet McCabe, Helen
author_sort McCabe, Helen
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper considers an oft-criticised passage of John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women, arguing that Mill’s position is misunderstood. In this passage, Mill identifies a trilemma facing women in non-ideal circumstances. Two elements of this can be satisfied, but not all three, so long as men continue to refuse to perform their domestic responsibilities. In these non-ideal circumstances, Mill privileges justice over autonomy – women ought only to be asked to do their fair share of labour, which, if they chose to marry and have children, will mean it is unfair to ask them also to work full-time outside the home.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T20:01:56Z
format Article
id nottingham-46386
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T20:01:56Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Imprint Academic
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-463862020-05-04T19:24:35Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46386/ “Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour McCabe, Helen This paper considers an oft-criticised passage of John Stuart Mill’s The Subjection of Women, arguing that Mill’s position is misunderstood. In this passage, Mill identifies a trilemma facing women in non-ideal circumstances. Two elements of this can be satisfied, but not all three, so long as men continue to refuse to perform their domestic responsibilities. In these non-ideal circumstances, Mill privileges justice over autonomy – women ought only to be asked to do their fair share of labour, which, if they chose to marry and have children, will mean it is unfair to ask them also to work full-time outside the home. Imprint Academic 2018-01-01 Article PeerReviewed McCabe, Helen (2018) “Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour. History of Political Thought, 39 (1). pp. 135-155. ISSN 0143-781X John Stuart Mill; family; justice; history of political thought; family. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/hpt/2018/00000039/00000001/art00007
spellingShingle John Stuart Mill; family; justice; history of political thought; family.
McCabe, Helen
“Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour
title “Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour
title_full “Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour
title_fullStr “Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour
title_full_unstemmed “Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour
title_short “Good housekeeping”? Re-assessing John Stuart Mill’s position on the gendered division of labour
title_sort “good housekeeping”? re-assessing john stuart mill’s position on the gendered division of labour
topic John Stuart Mill; family; justice; history of political thought; family.
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46386/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/46386/