Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing?

Additive manufacturing (AM) technology is capable of building up component geometry in a layer-by-layer process, entirely without tools, molds, or dies. One advantage of the approach is that it is capable of efficiently creating complex product geometry. Using experimental data collected during the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baumers, Martin, Tuck, Christopher, Wildman, Ricky D., Ashcroft, Ian, Hague, Richard J.M.
Format: Article
Published: Wiley for Yale University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45498/
_version_ 1848797143691689984
author Baumers, Martin
Tuck, Christopher
Wildman, Ricky D.
Ashcroft, Ian
Hague, Richard J.M.
author_facet Baumers, Martin
Tuck, Christopher
Wildman, Ricky D.
Ashcroft, Ian
Hague, Richard J.M.
author_sort Baumers, Martin
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Additive manufacturing (AM) technology is capable of building up component geometry in a layer-by-layer process, entirely without tools, molds, or dies. One advantage of the approach is that it is capable of efficiently creating complex product geometry. Using experimental data collected during the manufacture of a titanium test part on a variant of AM technology, electron beam melting (EBM), this research studies the effect of a variation in product shape complexity on process energy consumption. This is done by applying a computationally quantifiable convexity-based characteristic associated with shape complexity to the test part and correlating this quantity with per-layer process energy consumption on the EBM system. Only a weak correlation is found between the complexity metric and energy consumption (ρ = .35), suggesting that process energy consumption is indeed not driven by shape complexity. This result is discussed in the context of the energy consumption of computer-controlled machining technology, which forms an important substitute to EBM. This article further discusses the impact of available additional shape complexity at the manufacturing process level on the incentives toward minimization of energy inputs, additional benefits arising later within the product’s life cycle, and its implications for value creation possibilities.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:59:12Z
format Article
id nottingham-45498
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:59:12Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley for Yale University
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-454982020-05-04T17:30:38Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45498/ Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing? Baumers, Martin Tuck, Christopher Wildman, Ricky D. Ashcroft, Ian Hague, Richard J.M. Additive manufacturing (AM) technology is capable of building up component geometry in a layer-by-layer process, entirely without tools, molds, or dies. One advantage of the approach is that it is capable of efficiently creating complex product geometry. Using experimental data collected during the manufacture of a titanium test part on a variant of AM technology, electron beam melting (EBM), this research studies the effect of a variation in product shape complexity on process energy consumption. This is done by applying a computationally quantifiable convexity-based characteristic associated with shape complexity to the test part and correlating this quantity with per-layer process energy consumption on the EBM system. Only a weak correlation is found between the complexity metric and energy consumption (ρ = .35), suggesting that process energy consumption is indeed not driven by shape complexity. This result is discussed in the context of the energy consumption of computer-controlled machining technology, which forms an important substitute to EBM. This article further discusses the impact of available additional shape complexity at the manufacturing process level on the incentives toward minimization of energy inputs, additional benefits arising later within the product’s life cycle, and its implications for value creation possibilities. Wiley for Yale University 2016-01-21 Article PeerReviewed Baumers, Martin, Tuck, Christopher, Wildman, Ricky D., Ashcroft, Ian and Hague, Richard J.M. (2016) Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing? Journal of Industrial Ecology . ISSN 1530-9290 3D Printing Additive manufacturing (AM) Electron beam melting (EBM) Energy consumption Industrial ecology shape complexity http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.12397/full doi:10.1111/jiec.12397 doi:10.1111/jiec.12397
spellingShingle 3D Printing
Additive manufacturing (AM)
Electron beam melting (EBM)
Energy consumption
Industrial ecology shape complexity
Baumers, Martin
Tuck, Christopher
Wildman, Ricky D.
Ashcroft, Ian
Hague, Richard J.M.
Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing?
title Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing?
title_full Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing?
title_fullStr Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing?
title_full_unstemmed Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing?
title_short Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing?
title_sort shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing?
topic 3D Printing
Additive manufacturing (AM)
Electron beam melting (EBM)
Energy consumption
Industrial ecology shape complexity
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45498/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45498/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45498/