Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research
Stroke represents a major burden to patients and society, and resources spent on stroke research must be used efficiently and produce good value in terms of improvements in human health. However, there are many examples of poor value from stroke research funding, which result from the way in which s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45466/ |
| _version_ | 1848797137206247424 |
|---|---|
| author | Berge, Eivind Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam van der Worp, H. Bart Stapf, Christian Sandercock, Peter Sprigg, Nikola Macleod, Malcolm R. Kelly, Peter J. Nederkoorn, Paul J. Ford, Gary A. |
| author_facet | Berge, Eivind Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam van der Worp, H. Bart Stapf, Christian Sandercock, Peter Sprigg, Nikola Macleod, Malcolm R. Kelly, Peter J. Nederkoorn, Paul J. Ford, Gary A. |
| author_sort | Berge, Eivind |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Stroke represents a major burden to patients and society, and resources spent on stroke research must be used efficiently and produce good value in terms of improvements in human health. However, there are many examples of poor value from stroke research funding, which result from the way in which stroke research has been chosen, designed, conducted, analysed, regulated, managed, disseminated, or reported. In a project including a survey and a symposium and involving stroke researchers in the European Stroke Organisation we have sought to identify sources of inefficiency and waste, recommended approaches to increase value, and highlighted examples of best practice in stroke research. Recent evidence suggests that progress has been made, but there is room for much improvement, and stroke researchers, funders and other stakeholders might consider our recommendations when planning new research. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:59:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-45466 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:59:05Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-454662020-05-04T18:48:20Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45466/ Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research Berge, Eivind Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam van der Worp, H. Bart Stapf, Christian Sandercock, Peter Sprigg, Nikola Macleod, Malcolm R. Kelly, Peter J. Nederkoorn, Paul J. Ford, Gary A. Stroke represents a major burden to patients and society, and resources spent on stroke research must be used efficiently and produce good value in terms of improvements in human health. However, there are many examples of poor value from stroke research funding, which result from the way in which stroke research has been chosen, designed, conducted, analysed, regulated, managed, disseminated, or reported. In a project including a survey and a symposium and involving stroke researchers in the European Stroke Organisation we have sought to identify sources of inefficiency and waste, recommended approaches to increase value, and highlighted examples of best practice in stroke research. Recent evidence suggests that progress has been made, but there is room for much improvement, and stroke researchers, funders and other stakeholders might consider our recommendations when planning new research. Elsevier 2017-05-31 Article PeerReviewed Berge, Eivind, Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam, van der Worp, H. Bart, Stapf, Christian, Sandercock, Peter, Sprigg, Nikola, Macleod, Malcolm R., Kelly, Peter J., Nederkoorn, Paul J. and Ford, Gary A. (2017) Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research. Lancet Neurology, 16 (5). pp. 399-408. ISSN 1474-4465 Stroke research; prioritisation design conduct analysis regulation management accessibility reporting REWARD campaign; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474442217300789?via%3Dihub doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30078-9 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30078-9 |
| spellingShingle | Stroke research; prioritisation design conduct analysis regulation management accessibility reporting REWARD campaign; Berge, Eivind Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam van der Worp, H. Bart Stapf, Christian Sandercock, Peter Sprigg, Nikola Macleod, Malcolm R. Kelly, Peter J. Nederkoorn, Paul J. Ford, Gary A. Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research |
| title | Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research |
| title_full | Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research |
| title_fullStr | Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research |
| title_full_unstemmed | Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research |
| title_short | Increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research |
| title_sort | increasing value and reducing waste in stroke research |
| topic | Stroke research; prioritisation design conduct analysis regulation management accessibility reporting REWARD campaign; |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45466/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45466/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45466/ |