Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research

Methodological rigour, or its absence, is often a focus of concern for the emerging field of evaluation and research around arts and dementia. However, this paper suggests that critical attention should also be paid to the way in which individual perceptions, hidden assumptions and underlying social...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gray, Karen, Chester Evans, Simon, Griffiths, Amanda, Schneider, Justine M.
Format: Article
Published: SAGE 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45420/
_version_ 1848797127821492224
author Gray, Karen
Chester Evans, Simon
Griffiths, Amanda
Schneider, Justine M.
author_facet Gray, Karen
Chester Evans, Simon
Griffiths, Amanda
Schneider, Justine M.
author_sort Gray, Karen
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Methodological rigour, or its absence, is often a focus of concern for the emerging field of evaluation and research around arts and dementia. However, this paper suggests that critical attention should also be paid to the way in which individual perceptions, hidden assumptions and underlying social and political structures influence methodological work in the field. Such attention will be particularly important for addressing methodological challenges relating to contextual variability, ethics, value judgement, and signification identified through a literature review on this topic. Understanding how, where and when evaluators and researchers experience such challenges may help to identify fruitful approaches for future evaluation. This paper is based upon a presentation on the subject given at the First International Research Conference on the Arts and Dementia: Theory, Methodology and Evidence on 9 March 2017.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:58:56Z
format Article
id nottingham-45420
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:58:56Z
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-454202020-05-04T19:10:39Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45420/ Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research Gray, Karen Chester Evans, Simon Griffiths, Amanda Schneider, Justine M. Methodological rigour, or its absence, is often a focus of concern for the emerging field of evaluation and research around arts and dementia. However, this paper suggests that critical attention should also be paid to the way in which individual perceptions, hidden assumptions and underlying social and political structures influence methodological work in the field. Such attention will be particularly important for addressing methodological challenges relating to contextual variability, ethics, value judgement, and signification identified through a literature review on this topic. Understanding how, where and when evaluators and researchers experience such challenges may help to identify fruitful approaches for future evaluation. This paper is based upon a presentation on the subject given at the First International Research Conference on the Arts and Dementia: Theory, Methodology and Evidence on 9 March 2017. SAGE 2017-10-05 Article PeerReviewed Gray, Karen, Chester Evans, Simon, Griffiths, Amanda and Schneider, Justine M. (2017) Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research. Dementia . ISSN 1741-2684 arts evaluation methodology methodological challenge epistemology methods complexity http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1471301217734478 doi:10.1177/1471301217734478 doi:10.1177/1471301217734478
spellingShingle arts evaluation methodology methodological challenge epistemology methods complexity
Gray, Karen
Chester Evans, Simon
Griffiths, Amanda
Schneider, Justine M.
Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research
title Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research
title_full Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research
title_fullStr Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research
title_full_unstemmed Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research
title_short Critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research
title_sort critical reflections on methodological challenge in arts and dementia evaluation and research
topic arts evaluation methodology methodological challenge epistemology methods complexity
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45420/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45420/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45420/