Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy

Aim: Muscle thickness (MT) measured by ultrasound has been used to estimate cross-sectional area (measured by CT and MRI) at a single time-point. We tested whether MT could be used as a valid marker of MRI determined muscle anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSA) and volume changes following resistan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franchi, Martino V., Longo, Stefano, Mallinson, Joanne E., Quinlan, Jonathan I., Taylor, Tariq, Greenhaff, Paul L., Narici, Marco V.
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45129/
_version_ 1848797075475529728
author Franchi, Martino V.
Longo, Stefano
Mallinson, Joanne E.
Quinlan, Jonathan I.
Taylor, Tariq
Greenhaff, Paul L.
Narici, Marco V.
author_facet Franchi, Martino V.
Longo, Stefano
Mallinson, Joanne E.
Quinlan, Jonathan I.
Taylor, Tariq
Greenhaff, Paul L.
Narici, Marco V.
author_sort Franchi, Martino V.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Aim: Muscle thickness (MT) measured by ultrasound has been used to estimate cross-sectional area (measured by CT and MRI) at a single time-point. We tested whether MT could be used as a valid marker of MRI determined muscle anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSA) and volume changes following resistance training (RT). Methods: Nine healthy, young, male volunteers (24±2 y.o., BMI 24.1±2.8 kg/m2) had vastus lateralis (VL) muscle volume (VOL) and ACSA mid (at 50% of femur length, FL) assessed by MRI, and VL MT measured by ultrasound at 50% FL. Measurements were taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of isokinetic RT. Differences between baseline and post-training were assessed by Student’s paired t-test. The relationships between MRI and ultrasound measurements were tested by Pearson’s correlation. Results: After RT, MT increased by 7.5±6.1% (p<0.001), ACSAmid by 5.2±5% (p<0.001) and VOL by 5.0±6.9% (p<0.05) (values: means±S.D.). Positive correlations were found, at baseline and 12 weeks, between MT and ACSAmid (r=0.82, p<0.001 and r=0.73, p<0.001, respectively), and between MT and VOL (r=0.76, p < 0.001 and r=0.73, p < 0.001, respectively). The % change in MT with training was correlated with % change in ACSAmid (r=0.69, p = 0.01), but not % change in VOL (r= 0.33, p>0.05). Conclusions: These data support evidence that MT is a reliable index of muscle ACSAmid and VOL at a single time-point. MT changes following RT are associated with parallel changes in muscle ACSAmid but not with the changes in VOL, highlighting the impact of RT on regional hypertrophy.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:58:07Z
format Article
id nottingham-45129
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:58:07Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-451292024-08-15T15:24:10Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45129/ Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy Franchi, Martino V. Longo, Stefano Mallinson, Joanne E. Quinlan, Jonathan I. Taylor, Tariq Greenhaff, Paul L. Narici, Marco V. Aim: Muscle thickness (MT) measured by ultrasound has been used to estimate cross-sectional area (measured by CT and MRI) at a single time-point. We tested whether MT could be used as a valid marker of MRI determined muscle anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSA) and volume changes following resistance training (RT). Methods: Nine healthy, young, male volunteers (24±2 y.o., BMI 24.1±2.8 kg/m2) had vastus lateralis (VL) muscle volume (VOL) and ACSA mid (at 50% of femur length, FL) assessed by MRI, and VL MT measured by ultrasound at 50% FL. Measurements were taken at baseline and after 12 weeks of isokinetic RT. Differences between baseline and post-training were assessed by Student’s paired t-test. The relationships between MRI and ultrasound measurements were tested by Pearson’s correlation. Results: After RT, MT increased by 7.5±6.1% (p<0.001), ACSAmid by 5.2±5% (p<0.001) and VOL by 5.0±6.9% (p<0.05) (values: means±S.D.). Positive correlations were found, at baseline and 12 weeks, between MT and ACSAmid (r=0.82, p<0.001 and r=0.73, p<0.001, respectively), and between MT and VOL (r=0.76, p < 0.001 and r=0.73, p < 0.001, respectively). The % change in MT with training was correlated with % change in ACSAmid (r=0.69, p = 0.01), but not % change in VOL (r= 0.33, p>0.05). Conclusions: These data support evidence that MT is a reliable index of muscle ACSAmid and VOL at a single time-point. MT changes following RT are associated with parallel changes in muscle ACSAmid but not with the changes in VOL, highlighting the impact of RT on regional hypertrophy. Wiley 2017-09-21 Article PeerReviewed Franchi, Martino V., Longo, Stefano, Mallinson, Joanne E., Quinlan, Jonathan I., Taylor, Tariq, Greenhaff, Paul L. and Narici, Marco V. (2017) Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 28 (3). pp. 846-853. ISSN 1600-0838 MRI ; ACSA ; Ultrasound; Volume http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sms.12961/abstract doi:10.1111/sms.12961 doi:10.1111/sms.12961
spellingShingle MRI ; ACSA ; Ultrasound; Volume
Franchi, Martino V.
Longo, Stefano
Mallinson, Joanne E.
Quinlan, Jonathan I.
Taylor, Tariq
Greenhaff, Paul L.
Narici, Marco V.
Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy
title Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy
title_full Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy
title_fullStr Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy
title_full_unstemmed Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy
title_short Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy
title_sort muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross sectional area in the assessment of strength training induced hypertrophy
topic MRI ; ACSA ; Ultrasound; Volume
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45129/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45129/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45129/