Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension
As renewable electricity generation capacity increases, energy storage will be required at larger scales. Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) at large scales, with effective management of heat, is recognised to have potential to provide affordable grid-scale energy storage. Where suitable geologies...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45063/ |
| _version_ | 1848797060740939776 |
|---|---|
| author | Kantharaj, Bharath Garvey, Seamus D. Pimm, Andrew James |
| author_facet | Kantharaj, Bharath Garvey, Seamus D. Pimm, Andrew James |
| author_sort | Kantharaj, Bharath |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | As renewable electricity generation capacity increases, energy storage will be required at larger scales. Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) at large scales, with effective management of heat, is recognised to have potential to provide affordable grid-scale energy storage. Where suitable geologies are unavailable, compressed air could be stored in pressurised steel tanks above ground, but this would incur significant storage costs. Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES), on the other hand, does not need a pressurised storage vessel, can be located almost anywhere, has a relatively large volumetric exergy density at ambient pressure, and has relatively low marginal cost of energy storage capacity even at modest scales. However, it has lower roundtrip efficiency than compressed air energy storage technologies. This paper carries out thermodynamic analyses for an energy storage installation comprising a compressed air component supplemented with a liquid air store, and additional machinery to transform between gaseous air at ambient temperature and high pressure, and liquid air at ambient pressure. A roundtrip efficiency of 42% is obtained for the conversion of compressed air at 50 bar to liquid air, and back. The proposed system is more economical than pure LAES and more economical than a pure CAES installation if the storage duration is sufficiently long and if the high-pressure air store cannot exploit some large-scale geological feature. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:57:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-45063 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:57:53Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-450632020-05-04T17:18:04Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45063/ Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension Kantharaj, Bharath Garvey, Seamus D. Pimm, Andrew James As renewable electricity generation capacity increases, energy storage will be required at larger scales. Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) at large scales, with effective management of heat, is recognised to have potential to provide affordable grid-scale energy storage. Where suitable geologies are unavailable, compressed air could be stored in pressurised steel tanks above ground, but this would incur significant storage costs. Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES), on the other hand, does not need a pressurised storage vessel, can be located almost anywhere, has a relatively large volumetric exergy density at ambient pressure, and has relatively low marginal cost of energy storage capacity even at modest scales. However, it has lower roundtrip efficiency than compressed air energy storage technologies. This paper carries out thermodynamic analyses for an energy storage installation comprising a compressed air component supplemented with a liquid air store, and additional machinery to transform between gaseous air at ambient temperature and high pressure, and liquid air at ambient pressure. A roundtrip efficiency of 42% is obtained for the conversion of compressed air at 50 bar to liquid air, and back. The proposed system is more economical than pure LAES and more economical than a pure CAES installation if the storage duration is sufficiently long and if the high-pressure air store cannot exploit some large-scale geological feature. Elsevier 2015-11-01 Article PeerReviewed Kantharaj, Bharath, Garvey, Seamus D. and Pimm, Andrew James (2015) Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension. Applied Energy, 157 . pp. 152-164. ISSN 0306-2619 Energy storage Compressed air energy storage Liquid air energy storage Multistream plate-fin heat exchanger Exergy http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915009435 doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.076 doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.076 |
| spellingShingle | Energy storage Compressed air energy storage Liquid air energy storage Multistream plate-fin heat exchanger Exergy Kantharaj, Bharath Garvey, Seamus D. Pimm, Andrew James Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension |
| title | Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension |
| title_full | Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension |
| title_fullStr | Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension |
| title_full_unstemmed | Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension |
| title_short | Compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension |
| title_sort | compressed air energy storage with liquid air capacity extension |
| topic | Energy storage Compressed air energy storage Liquid air energy storage Multistream plate-fin heat exchanger Exergy |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45063/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45063/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/45063/ |