Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics

Objective: Rates of hospital presentation for self-harm in England were compared using different national and local data sources. Design: The study was descriptive and compared bespoke data collection methods for recording self-harm presentations to hospital with routinely collected hospital data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clements, Caroline, Turnbull, Pauline, Hawton, Keith, Geulayov, Galit, Waters, Keith, Ness, Jennifer, Townsend, Ellen, Kundakar, Kazem, Kapur, Nav
Format: Article
Published: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2016
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44639/
_version_ 1848796962778775552
author Clements, Caroline
Turnbull, Pauline
Hawton, Keith
Geulayov, Galit
Waters, Keith
Ness, Jennifer
Townsend, Ellen
Kundakar, Kazem
Kapur, Nav
author_facet Clements, Caroline
Turnbull, Pauline
Hawton, Keith
Geulayov, Galit
Waters, Keith
Ness, Jennifer
Townsend, Ellen
Kundakar, Kazem
Kapur, Nav
author_sort Clements, Caroline
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: Rates of hospital presentation for self-harm in England were compared using different national and local data sources. Design: The study was descriptive and compared bespoke data collection methods for recording self-harm presentations to hospital with routinely collected hospital data. Setting: Local area data on self-harm from the 3 centres of the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England (Oxford, Manchester and Derby) were used along with national and local routinely collected data on self-harm admissions and emergency department attendances from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). Primary outcome: Rate ratios were calculated to compare rates of self-harm generated using different data sources nationally and locally (between 2010 and 2012) and rates of hospital presentations for self-harm were plotted over time (between 2003 and 2012), based on different data sources. Results The total number of self-harm episodes between 2010 and 2012 was 13 547 based on Multicentre Study data, 9600 based on HES emergency department data and 8096 based on HES admission data. Nationally, routine HES data underestimated overall rates of self-harm by approximately 60% compared with rates based on Multicentre Study data (rate ratio for HES emergency department data, 0.41 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.49); rate ratio for HES admission data, 0.42 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.49)). Direct local area comparisons confirmed an overall underascertainment in the HES data, although the difference varied between centres. There was a general increase in self-harm over time according to HES data which contrasted with a fall and then a rise in the Multicentre Study data. Conclusions: There was a consistent underestimation of presentations for self-harm recorded by HES emergency department data, and fluctuations in year-on-year figures. HES admission data appeared more reliable but missed non-admitted episodes. Routinely collected data may miss important trends in self-harm and cannot be used in isolation as the basis for a robust national indicator of self-harm.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:56:19Z
format Article
id nottingham-44639
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:56:19Z
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-446392020-05-04T17:28:37Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44639/ Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics Clements, Caroline Turnbull, Pauline Hawton, Keith Geulayov, Galit Waters, Keith Ness, Jennifer Townsend, Ellen Kundakar, Kazem Kapur, Nav Objective: Rates of hospital presentation for self-harm in England were compared using different national and local data sources. Design: The study was descriptive and compared bespoke data collection methods for recording self-harm presentations to hospital with routinely collected hospital data. Setting: Local area data on self-harm from the 3 centres of the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England (Oxford, Manchester and Derby) were used along with national and local routinely collected data on self-harm admissions and emergency department attendances from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). Primary outcome: Rate ratios were calculated to compare rates of self-harm generated using different data sources nationally and locally (between 2010 and 2012) and rates of hospital presentations for self-harm were plotted over time (between 2003 and 2012), based on different data sources. Results The total number of self-harm episodes between 2010 and 2012 was 13 547 based on Multicentre Study data, 9600 based on HES emergency department data and 8096 based on HES admission data. Nationally, routine HES data underestimated overall rates of self-harm by approximately 60% compared with rates based on Multicentre Study data (rate ratio for HES emergency department data, 0.41 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.49); rate ratio for HES admission data, 0.42 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.49)). Direct local area comparisons confirmed an overall underascertainment in the HES data, although the difference varied between centres. There was a general increase in self-harm over time according to HES data which contrasted with a fall and then a rise in the Multicentre Study data. Conclusions: There was a consistent underestimation of presentations for self-harm recorded by HES emergency department data, and fluctuations in year-on-year figures. HES admission data appeared more reliable but missed non-admitted episodes. Routinely collected data may miss important trends in self-harm and cannot be used in isolation as the basis for a robust national indicator of self-harm. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2016-02-01 Article PeerReviewed Clements, Caroline, Turnbull, Pauline, Hawton, Keith, Geulayov, Galit, Waters, Keith, Ness, Jennifer, Townsend, Ellen, Kundakar, Kazem and Kapur, Nav (2016) Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics. BMJ Open, 6 . e009749/1-e009749/9. ISSN 2044-6055 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/2/e009749.info doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009749 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009749
spellingShingle Clements, Caroline
Turnbull, Pauline
Hawton, Keith
Geulayov, Galit
Waters, Keith
Ness, Jennifer
Townsend, Ellen
Kundakar, Kazem
Kapur, Nav
Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics
title Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics
title_full Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics
title_fullStr Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics
title_full_unstemmed Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics
title_short Rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the Multicentre Study of Self-Harm in England and Hospital Episode Statistics
title_sort rates of self-harm presenting to general hospitals: a comparison of data from the multicentre study of self-harm in england and hospital episode statistics
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44639/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44639/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44639/