Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury

Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a promising, unconventional mode of ventilation for the treatment of various respiratory diseases, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, despite increasing global use and reported advantages of APRV over other modes, definitive c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Al-Ahmad, Abdullmohsen Mohammed
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44246/
_version_ 1848796870881574912
author Al-Ahmad, Abdullmohsen Mohammed
author_facet Al-Ahmad, Abdullmohsen Mohammed
author_sort Al-Ahmad, Abdullmohsen Mohammed
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a promising, unconventional mode of ventilation for the treatment of various respiratory diseases, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, despite increasing global use and reported advantages of APRV over other modes, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn due to several concerns. First, the major confusion between APRV and other, similar modes, such as bi-phasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP). Second, clinical and methodological heterogeneity among published studies of APRV are understandably extensive, which contributes to outcome variability. Third, the absence of consensus on a standard protocol with clear rationale for the settings. This thesis provides an overview of the spectrum of ventilator settings that may be designated as APRV, summarises the research and clinical use status of APRV, exemplifies the need to clarify the characteristics that comprise the mode, and to assure reports of APRV use, from case reports through RCTs, including adequate data for a proper assessment. It encourages continued publication of observational as well as experimental clinical trial data, and discusses the feasibility of analysis strategies that may expand the information available from small patient samples. It also presents an unpublished, comprehensive, multifaceted clinical practice protocol (Al-ahmad protocol) for the use of APRV. Using the Al-ahmad protocol, four studies were conducted on non-spontaneously breathing patients who had ARDS (arising from a variety of pathologies). One study used a validated physiological simulator called integrated cardiopulmonary models (ICPMs) while the other three, were prospective cohort observational studies on real patients. The first study evaluated patients’ responses to changes in inspiratory pressure during conventional ventilation (CV) and APRV modes, using ICPMs vs. a real patient. The second study compared partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) at any given ventilatory minute ventilation (MV) during CV and APRV. The third study aimed to identify proper configurations to optimise PaCO2 on patients with diverse pulmonary pathologies including restrictive (e.g. ARDS) and obstructive (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) when using APRV. The fourth study compared oxygenation and haemodynamic status during CV and APRV. Results from ICPMs appeared to be analogous for both modes except for the significant difference in MV and tidal volume observed in the simulated vs. real APRV patients. We found in our clinical studies that compared to conventional modes, APRV was associated with significantly lower PaCO2 at significantly lower levels of MV, better oxygenation, and haemodynamic status.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:54:51Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-44246
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:54:51Z
publishDate 2017
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-442462025-02-28T13:49:50Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44246/ Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury Al-Ahmad, Abdullmohsen Mohammed Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a promising, unconventional mode of ventilation for the treatment of various respiratory diseases, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, despite increasing global use and reported advantages of APRV over other modes, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn due to several concerns. First, the major confusion between APRV and other, similar modes, such as bi-phasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP). Second, clinical and methodological heterogeneity among published studies of APRV are understandably extensive, which contributes to outcome variability. Third, the absence of consensus on a standard protocol with clear rationale for the settings. This thesis provides an overview of the spectrum of ventilator settings that may be designated as APRV, summarises the research and clinical use status of APRV, exemplifies the need to clarify the characteristics that comprise the mode, and to assure reports of APRV use, from case reports through RCTs, including adequate data for a proper assessment. It encourages continued publication of observational as well as experimental clinical trial data, and discusses the feasibility of analysis strategies that may expand the information available from small patient samples. It also presents an unpublished, comprehensive, multifaceted clinical practice protocol (Al-ahmad protocol) for the use of APRV. Using the Al-ahmad protocol, four studies were conducted on non-spontaneously breathing patients who had ARDS (arising from a variety of pathologies). One study used a validated physiological simulator called integrated cardiopulmonary models (ICPMs) while the other three, were prospective cohort observational studies on real patients. The first study evaluated patients’ responses to changes in inspiratory pressure during conventional ventilation (CV) and APRV modes, using ICPMs vs. a real patient. The second study compared partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) at any given ventilatory minute ventilation (MV) during CV and APRV. The third study aimed to identify proper configurations to optimise PaCO2 on patients with diverse pulmonary pathologies including restrictive (e.g. ARDS) and obstructive (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) when using APRV. The fourth study compared oxygenation and haemodynamic status during CV and APRV. Results from ICPMs appeared to be analogous for both modes except for the significant difference in MV and tidal volume observed in the simulated vs. real APRV patients. We found in our clinical studies that compared to conventional modes, APRV was associated with significantly lower PaCO2 at significantly lower levels of MV, better oxygenation, and haemodynamic status. 2017-07-14 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44246/1/PhD%20_EThesis_Viva_25.05.2017_TI.pdf Al-Ahmad, Abdullmohsen Mohammed (2017) Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. APRV ARDS Lung injury Mechanical ventilation
spellingShingle APRV
ARDS
Lung injury
Mechanical ventilation
Al-Ahmad, Abdullmohsen Mohammed
Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury
title Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury
title_full Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury
title_fullStr Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury
title_full_unstemmed Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury
title_short Airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury
title_sort airway pressure release ventilation mode in lung injury
topic APRV
ARDS
Lung injury
Mechanical ventilation
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44246/