Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production

Greater understanding of the influences on long-term coffee productivity are needed to develop systems that are profitable, while maximizing ecosystem services and lowering negative environmental impacts. We examine a long-term experiment (15 years) established in Costa Rica in 2000 and compare inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schnabel, Florian, Melo Virginio Filho, Elias de, Xu, Su, Fisk, Ian D., Roupsard, Olivier, Haggar, Jeremy
Format: Article
Published: Springer Verlag 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44083/
_version_ 1848796833588969472
author Schnabel, Florian
Melo Virginio Filho, Elias de
Xu, Su
Fisk, Ian D.
Roupsard, Olivier
Haggar, Jeremy
author_facet Schnabel, Florian
Melo Virginio Filho, Elias de
Xu, Su
Fisk, Ian D.
Roupsard, Olivier
Haggar, Jeremy
author_sort Schnabel, Florian
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Greater understanding of the influences on long-term coffee productivity are needed to develop systems that are profitable, while maximizing ecosystem services and lowering negative environmental impacts. We examine a long-term experiment (15 years) established in Costa Rica in 2000 and compare intensive conventional (IC) coffee production under full sun with 19 agroforestry systems combining timber and service tree species with contrasting characteristics, with conventional and organic managements of different intensities. We assessed productivity through coffee yield and coffee morphological characteristics. IC had the highest productivity but had the highest yield bienniality; in the agroforestry systems productivity was similar for moderate conventional (MC) and intensive organic (IO) treatments (yield 5.3 vs 5.0 t/ha/year). Significantly lower yields were observed under shade than full sun, but coffee morphology was similar. Low input organic production (LO) declined to zero under the shade of the non-legume timber tree Terminalia amazonia but when legume tree species were chosen (Erythrina poepiggiana, Chloroleucon eurycyclum) LO coffee yield was not significantly different than for IO. For the first 6 years, coffee yield was higher under the shade of timber trees (Chloroleucon and Terminalia), while in the subsequent 7 years, Erythrina systems were more productive, presumably this is due to lower shade covers. If IC full sun plantations are not affordable or desired in the future, organic production is an interesting alternative with similar productivity to MC management and in LO systems incorporation of legume tree species is shown to be essential.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:54:16Z
format Article
id nottingham-44083
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:54:16Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Verlag
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-440832020-05-04T18:55:11Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44083/ Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production Schnabel, Florian Melo Virginio Filho, Elias de Xu, Su Fisk, Ian D. Roupsard, Olivier Haggar, Jeremy Greater understanding of the influences on long-term coffee productivity are needed to develop systems that are profitable, while maximizing ecosystem services and lowering negative environmental impacts. We examine a long-term experiment (15 years) established in Costa Rica in 2000 and compare intensive conventional (IC) coffee production under full sun with 19 agroforestry systems combining timber and service tree species with contrasting characteristics, with conventional and organic managements of different intensities. We assessed productivity through coffee yield and coffee morphological characteristics. IC had the highest productivity but had the highest yield bienniality; in the agroforestry systems productivity was similar for moderate conventional (MC) and intensive organic (IO) treatments (yield 5.3 vs 5.0 t/ha/year). Significantly lower yields were observed under shade than full sun, but coffee morphology was similar. Low input organic production (LO) declined to zero under the shade of the non-legume timber tree Terminalia amazonia but when legume tree species were chosen (Erythrina poepiggiana, Chloroleucon eurycyclum) LO coffee yield was not significantly different than for IO. For the first 6 years, coffee yield was higher under the shade of timber trees (Chloroleucon and Terminalia), while in the subsequent 7 years, Erythrina systems were more productive, presumably this is due to lower shade covers. If IC full sun plantations are not affordable or desired in the future, organic production is an interesting alternative with similar productivity to MC management and in LO systems incorporation of legume tree species is shown to be essential. Springer Verlag 2017-07-13 Article PeerReviewed Schnabel, Florian, Melo Virginio Filho, Elias de, Xu, Su, Fisk, Ian D., Roupsard, Olivier and Haggar, Jeremy (2017) Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production. Agroforestry Systems . ISSN 1572-9680 Agroforestry systems; Coffee yield; Coffee morphology; Sustainable production; Shade trees; Biennial bearing https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10457-017-0100-y doi:10.1007/s10457-017-0100-y doi:10.1007/s10457-017-0100-y
spellingShingle Agroforestry systems; Coffee yield; Coffee morphology; Sustainable production; Shade trees; Biennial bearing
Schnabel, Florian
Melo Virginio Filho, Elias de
Xu, Su
Fisk, Ian D.
Roupsard, Olivier
Haggar, Jeremy
Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production
title Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production
title_full Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production
title_fullStr Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production
title_full_unstemmed Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production
title_short Shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production
title_sort shade trees: a determinant to the relative success of organic versus conventional coffee production
topic Agroforestry systems; Coffee yield; Coffee morphology; Sustainable production; Shade trees; Biennial bearing
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44083/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44083/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/44083/