Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis

The increase of infections resistant to existing antimicrobial medicines has become a topic of concern for health professionals, policy makers and publics across the globe, however among the public there is a sense that this is an issue beyond their control. Research has shown that the news media ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Collins, Luke Curtis, Jaspal, Rusi, Nerlich, Brigitte
Format: Article
Published: Sage 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43709/
_version_ 1848796748748685312
author Collins, Luke Curtis
Jaspal, Rusi
Nerlich, Brigitte
author_facet Collins, Luke Curtis
Jaspal, Rusi
Nerlich, Brigitte
author_sort Collins, Luke Curtis
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The increase of infections resistant to existing antimicrobial medicines has become a topic of concern for health professionals, policy makers and publics across the globe, however among the public there is a sense that this is an issue beyond their control. Research has shown that the news media can have a significant role to play in the public’s understanding of science and medicine. In this article, we respond to a call by research councils in the UK to study antibiotic or antimicrobial resistance as a social phenomenon by providing a linguistic analysis of reporting on this issue in the UK press. We combine transitivity analysis with a Social Representations framework in order to determine who and what the social actors are in discussions of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the UK press (2010-2015), as well as which of those social actors are characterised as having agency in the processes around AMR. Findings show that antibiotics and the infections they are designed to treat are instilled with agency; that there is a tension between allocating responsibility to either doctors-as-prescribers or patients-as-users; and collectivisation of the general public as an unspecified ‘we’: marginalising live-stock farming and pharmaceutical industry responsibilities.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:52:55Z
format Article
id nottingham-43709
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:52:55Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Sage
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-437092020-05-04T18:50:52Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43709/ Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis Collins, Luke Curtis Jaspal, Rusi Nerlich, Brigitte The increase of infections resistant to existing antimicrobial medicines has become a topic of concern for health professionals, policy makers and publics across the globe, however among the public there is a sense that this is an issue beyond their control. Research has shown that the news media can have a significant role to play in the public’s understanding of science and medicine. In this article, we respond to a call by research councils in the UK to study antibiotic or antimicrobial resistance as a social phenomenon by providing a linguistic analysis of reporting on this issue in the UK press. We combine transitivity analysis with a Social Representations framework in order to determine who and what the social actors are in discussions of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the UK press (2010-2015), as well as which of those social actors are characterised as having agency in the processes around AMR. Findings show that antibiotics and the infections they are designed to treat are instilled with agency; that there is a tension between allocating responsibility to either doctors-as-prescribers or patients-as-users; and collectivisation of the general public as an unspecified ‘we’: marginalising live-stock farming and pharmaceutical industry responsibilities. Sage 2017-06-21 Article PeerReviewed Collins, Luke Curtis, Jaspal, Rusi and Nerlich, Brigitte (2017) Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine . ISSN 1461-7196 Antimicrobial resistance antibiotic resistance media social representations transitivity doi:10.1177/1363459317715777 doi:10.1177/1363459317715777
spellingShingle Antimicrobial resistance
antibiotic resistance
media
social representations
transitivity
Collins, Luke Curtis
Jaspal, Rusi
Nerlich, Brigitte
Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis
title Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis
title_full Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis
title_fullStr Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis
title_full_unstemmed Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis
title_short Who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in UK news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis
title_sort who or what has agency in the discussion of antimicrobial resistance in uk news media (2010-2015)?: a transitivity analysis
topic Antimicrobial resistance
antibiotic resistance
media
social representations
transitivity
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43709/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43709/