Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry

Geophysical techniques are widely applied in archaeological exploration, providing rapid and noninvasive site appraisal. Geochemical analyses contribute significantly in archaeometry, but conventional laboratory apparatus requires that samples are removed from their in situ context. Recent advances...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Booth, Adam D., Vandeginste, Veerle, Pike, Dominic, Abbey, Russell, Clark, Roger A., Green, Chris M., Howland, Nathan
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43645/
_version_ 1848796735290212352
author Booth, Adam D.
Vandeginste, Veerle
Pike, Dominic
Abbey, Russell
Clark, Roger A.
Green, Chris M.
Howland, Nathan
author_facet Booth, Adam D.
Vandeginste, Veerle
Pike, Dominic
Abbey, Russell
Clark, Roger A.
Green, Chris M.
Howland, Nathan
author_sort Booth, Adam D.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Geophysical techniques are widely applied in archaeological exploration, providing rapid and noninvasive site appraisal. Geochemical analyses contribute significantly in archaeometry, but conventional laboratory apparatus requires that samples are removed from their in situ context. Recent advances in field‐portable apparatus facilitate in situ geochemical analysis, and this apparatus is deployed in this paper alongside conventional geophysical analysis to characterize the archaeological prospectivity of a site. The target is subsurface debris at the crash site of a World War II Mosquito aircraft. A 100 m long transect of magnetic, electromagnetic (EM) and in situ X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements was acquired in November 2014, with soil samples also collected for laboratory validation. A subset of XRF measurements was repeated in August 2015 alongside a targeted grid, 900 m2 in area, of magnetic gradiometry profiles. Built chiefly from wood, the Mosquito responds weakly in magnetic and EM data; magnetic gradient anomalies of ±10 nT/m are instead attributed to thermoremanence in a burnt layer at 0.2–0.4 m depth, produced by the impact fire following the crash. XRF spectrometry reveals co‐located enrichments in copper (Cu) and zinc(Zn) ions (400% and 200%, respectively, above background). These metals are alloyed into brass, present in abundance in the ammunition on board the Mosquito. Records from the in situ XRF sampling compare well with laboratory validated data, although a bespoke calibration for the local soil type would improve the reliability of absolute geochemical concentrations. XRF responses vary significantly with ground conditions: the November 2014 acquisition was performed soon after ploughing at the site, potentially providing a fresh charge of metallic contaminants to the ground surface. Where the chemistry of a target is anomalous with respect to host soil and a source‐to‐surface transport mechanism is present, in situ XRF analysis offers improved understanding of a target compared to geophysical interpretation alone.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:52:42Z
format Article
id nottingham-43645
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:52:42Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-436452020-05-04T18:49:52Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43645/ Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry Booth, Adam D. Vandeginste, Veerle Pike, Dominic Abbey, Russell Clark, Roger A. Green, Chris M. Howland, Nathan Geophysical techniques are widely applied in archaeological exploration, providing rapid and noninvasive site appraisal. Geochemical analyses contribute significantly in archaeometry, but conventional laboratory apparatus requires that samples are removed from their in situ context. Recent advances in field‐portable apparatus facilitate in situ geochemical analysis, and this apparatus is deployed in this paper alongside conventional geophysical analysis to characterize the archaeological prospectivity of a site. The target is subsurface debris at the crash site of a World War II Mosquito aircraft. A 100 m long transect of magnetic, electromagnetic (EM) and in situ X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements was acquired in November 2014, with soil samples also collected for laboratory validation. A subset of XRF measurements was repeated in August 2015 alongside a targeted grid, 900 m2 in area, of magnetic gradiometry profiles. Built chiefly from wood, the Mosquito responds weakly in magnetic and EM data; magnetic gradient anomalies of ±10 nT/m are instead attributed to thermoremanence in a burnt layer at 0.2–0.4 m depth, produced by the impact fire following the crash. XRF spectrometry reveals co‐located enrichments in copper (Cu) and zinc(Zn) ions (400% and 200%, respectively, above background). These metals are alloyed into brass, present in abundance in the ammunition on board the Mosquito. Records from the in situ XRF sampling compare well with laboratory validated data, although a bespoke calibration for the local soil type would improve the reliability of absolute geochemical concentrations. XRF responses vary significantly with ground conditions: the November 2014 acquisition was performed soon after ploughing at the site, potentially providing a fresh charge of metallic contaminants to the ground surface. Where the chemistry of a target is anomalous with respect to host soil and a source‐to‐surface transport mechanism is present, in situ XRF analysis offers improved understanding of a target compared to geophysical interpretation alone. Wiley 2017-06-15 Article PeerReviewed Booth, Adam D., Vandeginste, Veerle, Pike, Dominic, Abbey, Russell, Clark, Roger A., Green, Chris M. and Howland, Nathan (2017) Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry. Archaeological Prospection . ISSN 1075-2196 air crash conflict archaeology geochemistry geophysics magnetometry XRF spectrometry http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arp.1575/abstract;jsessionid=B0B81D7720B3ECE652DC4D6FB6B324FF.f04t03 doi:10.1002/arp.1575 doi:10.1002/arp.1575
spellingShingle air crash
conflict archaeology
geochemistry
geophysics
magnetometry
XRF spectrometry
Booth, Adam D.
Vandeginste, Veerle
Pike, Dominic
Abbey, Russell
Clark, Roger A.
Green, Chris M.
Howland, Nathan
Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry
title Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry
title_full Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry
title_fullStr Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry
title_short Geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry
title_sort geochemical insight during archaeological geophysical exploration through in situ x‐ray fluorescence spectrometry
topic air crash
conflict archaeology
geochemistry
geophysics
magnetometry
XRF spectrometry
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43645/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43645/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43645/