Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic

The purpose of the essay is to offer a close reading of Hegel's account of the Fall along theologically orthodox lines. To this extent I am more in agreement with traditional readers of Hegel like Peter Hodgson, and more recently theologians like Graham Ward and Nicholas Adams who wish to bring...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Demjaha, Dritero
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2017
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43638/
_version_ 1848796733920772096
author Demjaha, Dritero
author_facet Demjaha, Dritero
author_sort Demjaha, Dritero
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The purpose of the essay is to offer a close reading of Hegel's account of the Fall along theologically orthodox lines. To this extent I am more in agreement with traditional readers of Hegel like Peter Hodgson, and more recently theologians like Graham Ward and Nicholas Adams who wish to bring Hegel closer to a 'generous orthodoxy' (Ward, p. 290) in order to open up the possibility of appropriating elements of the Hegelian project for the purposes of Christian theology and philosophy. In so far as I will argue for an orthodox reading of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia Logic, I will nevertheless try to show how this more or less theologically traditional reading of a religious account in Hegel engenders a sophisticated and in many ways novel meta-philosophical argument for the foundations of philosophy grounded in the features of human thought which participates in divine thought.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:52:41Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-43638
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:52:41Z
publishDate 2017
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-436382025-02-28T13:49:11Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43638/ Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic Demjaha, Dritero The purpose of the essay is to offer a close reading of Hegel's account of the Fall along theologically orthodox lines. To this extent I am more in agreement with traditional readers of Hegel like Peter Hodgson, and more recently theologians like Graham Ward and Nicholas Adams who wish to bring Hegel closer to a 'generous orthodoxy' (Ward, p. 290) in order to open up the possibility of appropriating elements of the Hegelian project for the purposes of Christian theology and philosophy. In so far as I will argue for an orthodox reading of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia Logic, I will nevertheless try to show how this more or less theologically traditional reading of a religious account in Hegel engenders a sophisticated and in many ways novel meta-philosophical argument for the foundations of philosophy grounded in the features of human thought which participates in divine thought. 2017-07-20 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43638/1/Dritero%20Demjaha_Master%27s%20thesis.pdf Demjaha, Dritero (2017) Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic. MRes thesis, University of Nottingham.
spellingShingle Demjaha, Dritero
Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic
title Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic
title_full Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic
title_fullStr Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic
title_full_unstemmed Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic
title_short Philosophical afterthought and Hegel's account of the Fall in the Encyclopaedia logic
title_sort philosophical afterthought and hegel's account of the fall in the encyclopaedia logic
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43638/