Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane

Objectives: Contra-lateral routing of signals (CROS) devices re-route sound between the deaf and hearing ears of unilaterally-deaf individuals. This rerouting would be expected to disrupt access to monaural level cues that can support monaural localisation in the horizontal plane. However, such a de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedley, Adam J., Kitterick, Pádraig T.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43602/
_version_ 1848796726064840704
author Pedley, Adam J.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
author_facet Pedley, Adam J.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
author_sort Pedley, Adam J.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Objectives: Contra-lateral routing of signals (CROS) devices re-route sound between the deaf and hearing ears of unilaterally-deaf individuals. This rerouting would be expected to disrupt access to monaural level cues that can support monaural localisation in the horizontal plane. However, such a detrimental effect has not been confirmed by clinical studies of CROS use. The present study aimed to exercise strict experimental control over the availability of monaural cues to localisation in the horizontal plane and the fitting of the CROS device to assess whether signal routing can impair the ability to locate sources of sound and, if so, whether CROS selectively disrupts monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal location, or both. Design: Unilateral deafness and CROS device use were simulated in twelve normal hearing participants. Monaural recordings of broadband white noise presented from three spatial locations (-60°, 0°, and +60°) were made in the ear canal of a model listener using a probe microphone with and without a CROS device. The recordings were presented to participants via an insert earphone placed in their right ear. The recordings were processed to disrupt either monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal sound location by roving presentation level or the energy across adjacent frequency bands, respectively. Localisation ability was assessed using a three-alternative forced-choice spatial discrimination task. Results: Participants localised above chance levels in all conditions. Spatial discrimination accuracy was poorer when participants only had access to monaural spectral cues compared to when monaural level cues were available. CROS use impaired localisation significantly regardless of whether level or spectral cues were available. For both cues, signal re-routing had a detrimental effect on the ability to localise sounds originating from the side of the deaf ear (-60°). CROS use also impaired the ability to use level cues to localise sounds originating from straight ahead (0°). Conclusions: The re-routing of sounds can restrict access to the monaural cues that provide a basis for determining sound location in the horizontal plane. Perhaps encouragingly, the results suggest that both monaural level and spectral cues may not be disrupted entirely by signal re-routing and that it may still be possible to reliably identify sounds originating on the hearing side.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:52:33Z
format Article
id nottingham-43602
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:52:33Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-436022020-05-04T19:10:03Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43602/ Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane Pedley, Adam J. Kitterick, Pádraig T. Objectives: Contra-lateral routing of signals (CROS) devices re-route sound between the deaf and hearing ears of unilaterally-deaf individuals. This rerouting would be expected to disrupt access to monaural level cues that can support monaural localisation in the horizontal plane. However, such a detrimental effect has not been confirmed by clinical studies of CROS use. The present study aimed to exercise strict experimental control over the availability of monaural cues to localisation in the horizontal plane and the fitting of the CROS device to assess whether signal routing can impair the ability to locate sources of sound and, if so, whether CROS selectively disrupts monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal location, or both. Design: Unilateral deafness and CROS device use were simulated in twelve normal hearing participants. Monaural recordings of broadband white noise presented from three spatial locations (-60°, 0°, and +60°) were made in the ear canal of a model listener using a probe microphone with and without a CROS device. The recordings were presented to participants via an insert earphone placed in their right ear. The recordings were processed to disrupt either monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal sound location by roving presentation level or the energy across adjacent frequency bands, respectively. Localisation ability was assessed using a three-alternative forced-choice spatial discrimination task. Results: Participants localised above chance levels in all conditions. Spatial discrimination accuracy was poorer when participants only had access to monaural spectral cues compared to when monaural level cues were available. CROS use impaired localisation significantly regardless of whether level or spectral cues were available. For both cues, signal re-routing had a detrimental effect on the ability to localise sounds originating from the side of the deaf ear (-60°). CROS use also impaired the ability to use level cues to localise sounds originating from straight ahead (0°). Conclusions: The re-routing of sounds can restrict access to the monaural cues that provide a basis for determining sound location in the horizontal plane. Perhaps encouragingly, the results suggest that both monaural level and spectral cues may not be disrupted entirely by signal re-routing and that it may still be possible to reliably identify sounds originating on the hearing side. Elsevier 2017-09-30 Article PeerReviewed Pedley, Adam J. and Kitterick, Pádraig T. (2017) Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane. Hearing Research, 353 . pp. 104-111. ISSN 1878-5891 (In Press) Monaural Localisation Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) Monaural level cues Monaural spectral Cues Unilateral deafness http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595516306098 doi:10.1016/j.heares.2017.06.007 doi:10.1016/j.heares.2017.06.007
spellingShingle Monaural Localisation
Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS)
Monaural level cues
Monaural spectral Cues
Unilateral deafness
Pedley, Adam J.
Kitterick, Pádraig T.
Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_full Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_fullStr Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_full_unstemmed Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_short Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
title_sort contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
topic Monaural Localisation
Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS)
Monaural level cues
Monaural spectral Cues
Unilateral deafness
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43602/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43602/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/43602/