Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams

The aim of this paper is to compare the flexural performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) and fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP). The investigated parameters included the strengthening material, namely TRM or FRP; the number of TRM/FRP layers; the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raoof, Saad M., Koutas, Lampros N., Bournas, Dionysios A.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42873/
_version_ 1848796589802389504
author Raoof, Saad M.
Koutas, Lampros N.
Bournas, Dionysios A.
author_facet Raoof, Saad M.
Koutas, Lampros N.
Bournas, Dionysios A.
author_sort Raoof, Saad M.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The aim of this paper is to compare the flexural performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) and fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP). The investigated parameters included the strengthening material, namely TRM or FRP; the number of TRM/FRP layers; the textile surface condition (coated and uncoated); the textile fibre material (carbon, coated basalt or glass fibres); and the end-anchorage system of the external reinforcement. Thirteen RC beams were fabricated, strengthened and tested in four-point bending. One beam served as control specimen, seven beams strengthened with TRM, and five with FRP. It was mainly found that: (a) TRM was generally inferior to FRP in enhancing the flexural capacity of RC beams, with the effectiveness ratio between the two systems varying from 0.46 to 0.80, depending on the parameters examined, (b) by tripling the number of TRM layers (from one to three), the TRM versus FRP effectiveness ratio was almost doubled, (c) providing coating to the dry textile enhanced the TRM effectiveness and altered the failure mode; (d) different textile materials, having approximately same axial stiffness, resulted in different flexural capacity increases; and (e) providing end-anchorage had a limited effect on the performance of TRM-retrofitted beams. Finally, a simple formula proposed by fib Model Code 2010 for FRP reinforcement was used to predict the mean debonding stress developed in the TRM reinforcement. It was found that this formula is in a good agreement with the average stress calculated based on the experimental results when failure was similar to FRP-strengthened beams.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:50:23Z
format Article
id nottingham-42873
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:50:23Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-428732020-05-04T19:09:28Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42873/ Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams Raoof, Saad M. Koutas, Lampros N. Bournas, Dionysios A. The aim of this paper is to compare the flexural performance of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) and fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP). The investigated parameters included the strengthening material, namely TRM or FRP; the number of TRM/FRP layers; the textile surface condition (coated and uncoated); the textile fibre material (carbon, coated basalt or glass fibres); and the end-anchorage system of the external reinforcement. Thirteen RC beams were fabricated, strengthened and tested in four-point bending. One beam served as control specimen, seven beams strengthened with TRM, and five with FRP. It was mainly found that: (a) TRM was generally inferior to FRP in enhancing the flexural capacity of RC beams, with the effectiveness ratio between the two systems varying from 0.46 to 0.80, depending on the parameters examined, (b) by tripling the number of TRM layers (from one to three), the TRM versus FRP effectiveness ratio was almost doubled, (c) providing coating to the dry textile enhanced the TRM effectiveness and altered the failure mode; (d) different textile materials, having approximately same axial stiffness, resulted in different flexural capacity increases; and (e) providing end-anchorage had a limited effect on the performance of TRM-retrofitted beams. Finally, a simple formula proposed by fib Model Code 2010 for FRP reinforcement was used to predict the mean debonding stress developed in the TRM reinforcement. It was found that this formula is in a good agreement with the average stress calculated based on the experimental results when failure was similar to FRP-strengthened beams. Elsevier 2017-10-01 Article PeerReviewed Raoof, Saad M., Koutas, Lampros N. and Bournas, Dionysios A. (2017) Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams. Construction and Building Materials, 151 . pp. 279-291. ISSN 1879-0526 Basalt fibres; Carbon fibres; Flexure; Glass fibres; Reinforced concrete; Strengthening; Textile reinforced mortar; TRM http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095006181730908X doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.023 doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.023
spellingShingle Basalt fibres; Carbon fibres; Flexure; Glass fibres; Reinforced concrete; Strengthening; Textile reinforced mortar; TRM
Raoof, Saad M.
Koutas, Lampros N.
Bournas, Dionysios A.
Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams
title Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams
title_full Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams
title_fullStr Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams
title_full_unstemmed Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams
title_short Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (FRP) in flexural strengthening of RC beams
title_sort textile-reinforced mortar (trm) versus fibre-reinforced polymers (frp) in flexural strengthening of rc beams
topic Basalt fibres; Carbon fibres; Flexure; Glass fibres; Reinforced concrete; Strengthening; Textile reinforced mortar; TRM
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42873/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42873/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42873/