Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries

Background: Surgical mortality data are collected routinely in high-income countries, yet virtually no low- or middle-income countries have outcome surveillance in place. The aim was prospectively to collect worldwide mortality data following emergency abdominal surgery, comparing findings across co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: GlobalSurg Collaborative
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2016
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42807/
_version_ 1848796572540731392
author GlobalSurg Collaborative
author_facet GlobalSurg Collaborative
author_sort GlobalSurg Collaborative
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Surgical mortality data are collected routinely in high-income countries, yet virtually no low- or middle-income countries have outcome surveillance in place. The aim was prospectively to collect worldwide mortality data following emergency abdominal surgery, comparing findings across countries with a low, middle or high Human Development Index (HDI). Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Self-selected hospitals performing emergency surgery submitted prespecified data for consecutive patients from at least one 2-week interval during July to December 2014. Postoperative mortality was analysed by hierarchical multivariable logistic regression. Results: Data were obtained for 10 745 patients from 357 centres in 58 countries; 6538 were from high-, 2889 from middle- and 1318 from low-HDI settings. The overall mortality rate was 1⋅6 per cent at 24 h (high 1⋅1 per cent, middle 1⋅9 per cent, low 3⋅4 per cent; P < 0⋅001), increasing to 5⋅4 per cent by 30 days (high 4⋅5 per cent, middle 6⋅0 per cent, low 8⋅6 per cent; P < 0⋅001). Of the 578 patients who died, 404 (69⋅9 per cent) did so between 24 h and 30 days following surgery (high 74⋅2 per cent, middle 68⋅8 per cent, low 60⋅5 per cent). After adjustment, 30-day mortality remained higher in middle-income (odds ratio (OR) 2⋅78, 95 per cent c.i. 1⋅84 to 4⋅20) and low-income (OR 2⋅97, 1⋅84 to 4⋅81) countries. Surgical safety checklist use was less frequent in low- and middle-income countries, but when used was associated with reduced mortality at 30 days. Conclusion: Mortality is three times higher in low- compared with high-HDI countries even when adjusted for prognostic factors. Patient safety factors may have an important role. Registration number: NCT02179112 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:50:07Z
format Article
id nottingham-42807
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:50:07Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-428072020-05-04T17:58:52Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42807/ Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries GlobalSurg Collaborative Background: Surgical mortality data are collected routinely in high-income countries, yet virtually no low- or middle-income countries have outcome surveillance in place. The aim was prospectively to collect worldwide mortality data following emergency abdominal surgery, comparing findings across countries with a low, middle or high Human Development Index (HDI). Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Self-selected hospitals performing emergency surgery submitted prespecified data for consecutive patients from at least one 2-week interval during July to December 2014. Postoperative mortality was analysed by hierarchical multivariable logistic regression. Results: Data were obtained for 10 745 patients from 357 centres in 58 countries; 6538 were from high-, 2889 from middle- and 1318 from low-HDI settings. The overall mortality rate was 1⋅6 per cent at 24 h (high 1⋅1 per cent, middle 1⋅9 per cent, low 3⋅4 per cent; P < 0⋅001), increasing to 5⋅4 per cent by 30 days (high 4⋅5 per cent, middle 6⋅0 per cent, low 8⋅6 per cent; P < 0⋅001). Of the 578 patients who died, 404 (69⋅9 per cent) did so between 24 h and 30 days following surgery (high 74⋅2 per cent, middle 68⋅8 per cent, low 60⋅5 per cent). After adjustment, 30-day mortality remained higher in middle-income (odds ratio (OR) 2⋅78, 95 per cent c.i. 1⋅84 to 4⋅20) and low-income (OR 2⋅97, 1⋅84 to 4⋅81) countries. Surgical safety checklist use was less frequent in low- and middle-income countries, but when used was associated with reduced mortality at 30 days. Conclusion: Mortality is three times higher in low- compared with high-HDI countries even when adjusted for prognostic factors. Patient safety factors may have an important role. Registration number: NCT02179112 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Wiley 2016-07-31 Article PeerReviewed GlobalSurg Collaborative (2016) Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries. British Journal of Surgery, 103 (8). pp. 971-988. ISSN 0007-1323 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bjs.10151/abstract doi:10.1002/bjs.10151 doi:10.1002/bjs.10151
spellingShingle GlobalSurg Collaborative
Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries
title Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries
title_full Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries
title_fullStr Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries
title_full_unstemmed Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries
title_short Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries
title_sort mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42807/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42807/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42807/