National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales

Background: The Mental Capacity Act (2005) (MCA) provides a legal framework for advance planning for both health and welfare in England and Wales for people if they lose mental capacity e.g. through mania or severe depression. Aims: To determine the proportion of people with bipolar disorder (BD) w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morriss, Richard, Mudigonda, Mohan, Bartlett, Peter, Chopra, Arun, Jones, Steven
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42701/
_version_ 1848796547112763392
author Morriss, Richard
Mudigonda, Mohan
Bartlett, Peter
Chopra, Arun
Jones, Steven
author_facet Morriss, Richard
Mudigonda, Mohan
Bartlett, Peter
Chopra, Arun
Jones, Steven
author_sort Morriss, Richard
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: The Mental Capacity Act (2005) (MCA) provides a legal framework for advance planning for both health and welfare in England and Wales for people if they lose mental capacity e.g. through mania or severe depression. Aims: To determine the proportion of people with bipolar disorder (BD) who utilise advance planning, their experience of using it and barriers to its implementation. Methods: National survey of people with clinical diagnosis of BD of their knowledge, use and experience of the MCA. Thematically analysed qualitative interviews with maximum variance sample of people with BD. Results: 544 respondents with BD participated in the survey; 18 in the qualitative study. 403 (74.1%) believed making plans about their personal welfare if they lost capacity to be very important. 199 (36.6%) participants knew about the MCA. 54 (10%), 62 (11%) and 21 (4%) participants made advanced decisions to refuse treatment, advance statements and lasting power of attorney respectively. Barriers included not understanding its different forms, unrealistic expectations and advance plans ignored by services. Conclusion: In BD the demand for advance plans about welfare with loss of capacity was high but utilisation of the MCA was low with barriers at service user, clinician and organisation levels.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:49:43Z
format Article
id nottingham-42701
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:49:43Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-427012020-05-04T18:51:11Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42701/ National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales Morriss, Richard Mudigonda, Mohan Bartlett, Peter Chopra, Arun Jones, Steven Background: The Mental Capacity Act (2005) (MCA) provides a legal framework for advance planning for both health and welfare in England and Wales for people if they lose mental capacity e.g. through mania or severe depression. Aims: To determine the proportion of people with bipolar disorder (BD) who utilise advance planning, their experience of using it and barriers to its implementation. Methods: National survey of people with clinical diagnosis of BD of their knowledge, use and experience of the MCA. Thematically analysed qualitative interviews with maximum variance sample of people with BD. Results: 544 respondents with BD participated in the survey; 18 in the qualitative study. 403 (74.1%) believed making plans about their personal welfare if they lost capacity to be very important. 199 (36.6%) participants knew about the MCA. 54 (10%), 62 (11%) and 21 (4%) participants made advanced decisions to refuse treatment, advance statements and lasting power of attorney respectively. Barriers included not understanding its different forms, unrealistic expectations and advance plans ignored by services. Conclusion: In BD the demand for advance plans about welfare with loss of capacity was high but utilisation of the MCA was low with barriers at service user, clinician and organisation levels. Taylor & Francis 2017-06-23 Article PeerReviewed Morriss, Richard, Mudigonda, Mohan, Bartlett, Peter, Chopra, Arun and Jones, Steven (2017) National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales. Journal of Mental Health . ISSN 1360-0567 Advance directives Advance health care planning Bipolar disorder Health legislation http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2017.1340613 doi:10.1080/09638237.2017.1340613 doi:10.1080/09638237.2017.1340613
spellingShingle Advance directives
Advance health care planning
Bipolar disorder
Health legislation
Morriss, Richard
Mudigonda, Mohan
Bartlett, Peter
Chopra, Arun
Jones, Steven
National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales
title National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales
title_full National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales
title_fullStr National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales
title_full_unstemmed National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales
title_short National survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act by people with bipolar disorder in England and Wales
title_sort national survey and analysis of barriers to the utilisation of the 2005 mental capacity act by people with bipolar disorder in england and wales
topic Advance directives
Advance health care planning
Bipolar disorder
Health legislation
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42701/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42701/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42701/