Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research

Enhancing recovery from stroke with effective rehabilitation interventions remains an elusive goal.1 Although intensive rehabilitation therapies such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) show promise,2 the intervention has not been deployed in routine clinical practice. Slow uptake of CIMT...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boyd, Lara A., Walker, Marion F.
Format: Article
Published: American Heart Association 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42617/
_version_ 1848796528064331776
author Boyd, Lara A.
Walker, Marion F.
author_facet Boyd, Lara A.
Walker, Marion F.
author_sort Boyd, Lara A.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Enhancing recovery from stroke with effective rehabilitation interventions remains an elusive goal.1 Although intensive rehabilitation therapies such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) show promise,2 the intervention has not been deployed in routine clinical practice. Slow uptake of CIMT in routine clinical practice has been attributed to its large demand on professional resources and patient compliance, as well as the costs associated with delivering high doses of therapy in a relatively short time. To remediate these limitations, there have been calls for modified versions of CIMT that are less intensive, lower cost, and easier to deliver.3 Recent work by Barzel et al4 attempted to advance the understanding of modified forms of CIMT by applying this therapy in the home setting. Home CIMT includes the basic elements of CIMT including repetitive training, transfer of activities, and constraint of the nonparetic hand. However, Home CIMT attempts to accomplish each of these goals within the individual’s home setting under the supervision of a nonprofessional coach.4 Although study participants were involved in overall goal setting for their therapeutic program, they only interacted with professional rehabilitation practitioners (Occupational or Physical Therapists) in 5 visits: 2 initial home visits to set up the program in the first week of a 4-week program and 3 additional sessions to adjust the program during the next 3 weeks. The overall goal was 40 hours of task practice with the paretic arm for a 20-day period.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:49:25Z
format Article
id nottingham-42617
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:49:25Z
publishDate 2016
publisher American Heart Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-426172020-05-04T17:58:48Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42617/ Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research Boyd, Lara A. Walker, Marion F. Enhancing recovery from stroke with effective rehabilitation interventions remains an elusive goal.1 Although intensive rehabilitation therapies such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) show promise,2 the intervention has not been deployed in routine clinical practice. Slow uptake of CIMT in routine clinical practice has been attributed to its large demand on professional resources and patient compliance, as well as the costs associated with delivering high doses of therapy in a relatively short time. To remediate these limitations, there have been calls for modified versions of CIMT that are less intensive, lower cost, and easier to deliver.3 Recent work by Barzel et al4 attempted to advance the understanding of modified forms of CIMT by applying this therapy in the home setting. Home CIMT includes the basic elements of CIMT including repetitive training, transfer of activities, and constraint of the nonparetic hand. However, Home CIMT attempts to accomplish each of these goals within the individual’s home setting under the supervision of a nonprofessional coach.4 Although study participants were involved in overall goal setting for their therapeutic program, they only interacted with professional rehabilitation practitioners (Occupational or Physical Therapists) in 5 visits: 2 initial home visits to set up the program in the first week of a 4-week program and 3 additional sessions to adjust the program during the next 3 weeks. The overall goal was 40 hours of task practice with the paretic arm for a 20-day period. American Heart Association 2016-07-31 Article PeerReviewed Boyd, Lara A. and Walker, Marion F. (2016) Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research. Stroke, 47 (7). pp. 1960-1961. ISSN 1524-4628 epidemiology motor activity movement rehabilitation stroke http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/47/7/1960 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012423 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012423
spellingShingle epidemiology
motor activity
movement
rehabilitation
stroke
Boyd, Lara A.
Walker, Marion F.
Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research
title Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research
title_full Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research
title_fullStr Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research
title_full_unstemmed Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research
title_short Critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research
title_sort critique of home constraint-induced movement therapy trial: constraint-induced movement therapy study prompts the need for further research
topic epidemiology
motor activity
movement
rehabilitation
stroke
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42617/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42617/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42617/