Is the universe transparent?
We present our study on cosmic opacity, which relates to changes in photon number as photons travel from the source to the observer. Cosmic opacity may be caused by absorption or scattering due to matter in the Universe, or by extragalactic magnetic fields that can turn photons into unobserved parti...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
American Physical Society
2015
|
| Online Access: | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42174/ |
| _version_ | 1848796438274768896 |
|---|---|
| author | Liao, Kai Avgoustidis, Anastasios Li, Zhengxiang |
| author_facet | Liao, Kai Avgoustidis, Anastasios Li, Zhengxiang |
| author_sort | Liao, Kai |
| building | Nottingham Research Data Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | We present our study on cosmic opacity, which relates to changes in photon number as photons travel from the source to the observer. Cosmic opacity may be caused by absorption or scattering due to matter in the Universe, or by extragalactic magnetic fields that can turn photons into unobserved particles (e.g., light axions, chameleons, gravitons, Kaluza-Klein modes), and it is crucial to correctly interpret astronomical photometric measurements like type Ia supernovae observations. On the other hand, the expansion rate at different epochs, i.e., the observational Hubble parameter data H (z), are obtained from differential ageing of passively evolving galaxies or from baryon acoustic oscillations and thus are not affected by cosmic opacity. In this work, we first construct opacity-free luminosity distances from H (z) determinations, taking into consideration correlations between different redshifts for our error analysis. Moreover, we let the light-curve fitting parameters, accounting for distance estimation in type Ia supernovae observations, free to ensure that our analysis is authentically cosmological-model independent and gives a robust result. Any nonzero residuals between these two kinds of luminosity distances can be deemed as an indication of the existence of cosmic opacity. While a transparent Universe is currently consistent with the data, our results show that strong constraints on opacity (and consequently on physical mechanisms that could cause it) can be obtained in a cosmological-model-independent fashion. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:47:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | nottingham-42174 |
| institution | University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T19:47:59Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | American Physical Society |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | nottingham-421742020-05-04T20:11:19Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42174/ Is the universe transparent? Liao, Kai Avgoustidis, Anastasios Li, Zhengxiang We present our study on cosmic opacity, which relates to changes in photon number as photons travel from the source to the observer. Cosmic opacity may be caused by absorption or scattering due to matter in the Universe, or by extragalactic magnetic fields that can turn photons into unobserved particles (e.g., light axions, chameleons, gravitons, Kaluza-Klein modes), and it is crucial to correctly interpret astronomical photometric measurements like type Ia supernovae observations. On the other hand, the expansion rate at different epochs, i.e., the observational Hubble parameter data H (z), are obtained from differential ageing of passively evolving galaxies or from baryon acoustic oscillations and thus are not affected by cosmic opacity. In this work, we first construct opacity-free luminosity distances from H (z) determinations, taking into consideration correlations between different redshifts for our error analysis. Moreover, we let the light-curve fitting parameters, accounting for distance estimation in type Ia supernovae observations, free to ensure that our analysis is authentically cosmological-model independent and gives a robust result. Any nonzero residuals between these two kinds of luminosity distances can be deemed as an indication of the existence of cosmic opacity. While a transparent Universe is currently consistent with the data, our results show that strong constraints on opacity (and consequently on physical mechanisms that could cause it) can be obtained in a cosmological-model-independent fashion. American Physical Society 2015 Article PeerReviewed Liao, Kai, Avgoustidis, Anastasios and Li, Zhengxiang (2015) Is the universe transparent? Physical Review D, 92 (12). 123539/1-123539/9. ISSN 2470-0029 https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123539 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123539 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123539 |
| spellingShingle | Liao, Kai Avgoustidis, Anastasios Li, Zhengxiang Is the universe transparent? |
| title | Is the universe transparent? |
| title_full | Is the universe transparent? |
| title_fullStr | Is the universe transparent? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Is the universe transparent? |
| title_short | Is the universe transparent? |
| title_sort | is the universe transparent? |
| url | https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42174/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42174/ https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/42174/ |