Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia

Objectives: Willingness-to-pay (WTP) provides a broad assessment of well-being, capturing benefits beyond health. However, the validity of the approach has been questioned and the evidence relating to the sensitivity of WTP to changes in health status is mixed. Using menorrhagia (heavy menstrual ble...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanghera, Sabina, Frew, Emma, Gupta, Janesh Kumar, Kai, Joe, Roberts, Tracy Elizabeth
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41807/
_version_ 1848796357059411968
author Sanghera, Sabina
Frew, Emma
Gupta, Janesh Kumar
Kai, Joe
Roberts, Tracy Elizabeth
author_facet Sanghera, Sabina
Frew, Emma
Gupta, Janesh Kumar
Kai, Joe
Roberts, Tracy Elizabeth
author_sort Sanghera, Sabina
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Objectives: Willingness-to-pay (WTP) provides a broad assessment of well-being, capturing benefits beyond health. However, the validity of the approach has been questioned and the evidence relating to the sensitivity of WTP to changes in health status is mixed. Using menorrhagia (heavy menstrual bleeding) as a case study, this exploratory study assesses the sensitivity to scale of WTP to change in health status as measured by a condition-specific measure, MMAS, which includes both health and non-health benefits. The relationship between EQ-5D and change in health status is also assessed. Methods: Baseline EQ-5D and MMAS values were collected from women taking part in a randomized controlled trial for pharmaceutical treatment of menorrhagia. Following treatment, these measures were administered along with a WTP exercise. The relationship between the measures was assessed using Spearman's correlation analysis, and the sensitivity to scale of WTP was measured by identifying differences in WTP alongside differences in MMAS and EQ5D values. Results: Our exploratory findings indicated that WTP, and not EQ-5D, was significantly positively correlated with change in MMAS, providing some evidence for convergent validity. These findings suggest that WTP is capturing the non-health benefits within the MMAS measure. Mean WTP also increased with percentage improvements in MMAS, suggesting sensitivity to scale. Conclusion: When compared to quality of life measured using the condition-specific MMAS measure, the convergent validity and sensitivity to scale of WTP is indicated. The findings suggest that WTP is more sensitive to change in MMAS, than with EQ-5D.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:46:41Z
format Article
id nottingham-41807
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:46:41Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-418072020-05-04T18:40:29Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41807/ Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia Sanghera, Sabina Frew, Emma Gupta, Janesh Kumar Kai, Joe Roberts, Tracy Elizabeth Objectives: Willingness-to-pay (WTP) provides a broad assessment of well-being, capturing benefits beyond health. However, the validity of the approach has been questioned and the evidence relating to the sensitivity of WTP to changes in health status is mixed. Using menorrhagia (heavy menstrual bleeding) as a case study, this exploratory study assesses the sensitivity to scale of WTP to change in health status as measured by a condition-specific measure, MMAS, which includes both health and non-health benefits. The relationship between EQ-5D and change in health status is also assessed. Methods: Baseline EQ-5D and MMAS values were collected from women taking part in a randomized controlled trial for pharmaceutical treatment of menorrhagia. Following treatment, these measures were administered along with a WTP exercise. The relationship between the measures was assessed using Spearman's correlation analysis, and the sensitivity to scale of WTP was measured by identifying differences in WTP alongside differences in MMAS and EQ5D values. Results: Our exploratory findings indicated that WTP, and not EQ-5D, was significantly positively correlated with change in MMAS, providing some evidence for convergent validity. These findings suggest that WTP is capturing the non-health benefits within the MMAS measure. Mean WTP also increased with percentage improvements in MMAS, suggesting sensitivity to scale. Conclusion: When compared to quality of life measured using the condition-specific MMAS measure, the convergent validity and sensitivity to scale of WTP is indicated. The findings suggest that WTP is more sensitive to change in MMAS, than with EQ-5D. Wiley 2017-04-01 Article PeerReviewed Sanghera, Sabina, Frew, Emma, Gupta, Janesh Kumar, Kai, Joe and Roberts, Tracy Elizabeth (2017) Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia. Health Expectations, 20 (2). pp. 232-242. ISSN 1369-7625 willingness-to-pay; menorrhagia multi-attribute scale; convergent validity; EQ-5D; sensitivity to scale http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.12452/abstract doi:10.1111/hex.12452 doi:10.1111/hex.12452
spellingShingle willingness-to-pay; menorrhagia multi-attribute scale; convergent validity; EQ-5D; sensitivity to scale
Sanghera, Sabina
Frew, Emma
Gupta, Janesh Kumar
Kai, Joe
Roberts, Tracy Elizabeth
Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia
title Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia
title_full Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia
title_fullStr Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia
title_short Sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia
title_sort sensitivity to scale of willingness-to-pay within the context of menorrhagia
topic willingness-to-pay; menorrhagia multi-attribute scale; convergent validity; EQ-5D; sensitivity to scale
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41807/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41807/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41807/