Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012)

In an anonymous 4-person economic game, participants contributed more money to a common project (i.e., cooperated) when required to decide quickly than when forced to delay their decision (Rand, Greene & Nowak, 2012), a pattern consistent with the social heuristics hypothesis proposed by Rand an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bouwmeester, Samantha, Verkoeijen, Peter P.J.L., Aczel, Balazs, Barbosa, Fernando, Bègue, Laurent, Brañas-Garza, Pablo, Chmura, Thorsten, Cornelissen, Gert, Døssing, Felix S., Espín, Antonio M., Evans, Anthony M., Ferreira-Santos, Fernando, Fiedler, Susann, Flegr, Jaroslav, Ghaffari, Minou, Glöckner, Andreas, Goeschl, Timo, Guo, Lisa, Hauser, Oliver P., Hernan-Gonzalez, Roberto, Herrero, Anthony, Horne, Zachary, Houdek, Petr, Johannesson, Magnus, Koppel, Lina, Kujal, Praveen, Laine, Tei, Lohse, Johannes, Martins, Eva C., Mauro, Carlos, Mischkowski, Dorothee, Mukherjee, Sumitava, Myrseth, Kristian Ove, Navarro-Martinez, Daniel, Neal, Tess M.S., Novakova, Julie, Pagà, Roger, Paiva, Tiago O., Palfi, Bence, Piovesan, Marco, Rahal, Rima-Maria, Salomon, Erika, Srinivasan, Narayanan, Srivastava, Ajita, Szaszi, Barnabas, Szollosi, Aba, Thor, Karoline Ø., Tinghög, Gustav, Trueblood, Jennifer S., Van Bavel, J. Jay, van ‘t Veer, Anna E., Västfjäll, Daniel, Warner, Megan, Wengström, Erik, Wills, Julian, Wollbrant, Conny E.
Format: Article
Published: Sage 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41615/
_version_ 1848796316030730240
author Bouwmeester, Samantha
Verkoeijen, Peter P.J.L.
Aczel, Balazs
Barbosa, Fernando
Bègue, Laurent
Brañas-Garza, Pablo
Chmura, Thorsten
Cornelissen, Gert
Døssing, Felix S.
Espín, Antonio M.
Evans, Anthony M.
Ferreira-Santos, Fernando
Fiedler, Susann
Flegr, Jaroslav
Ghaffari, Minou
Glöckner, Andreas
Goeschl, Timo
Guo, Lisa
Hauser, Oliver P.
Hernan-Gonzalez, Roberto
Herrero, Anthony
Horne, Zachary
Houdek, Petr
Johannesson, Magnus
Koppel, Lina
Kujal, Praveen
Laine, Tei
Lohse, Johannes
Martins, Eva C.
Mauro, Carlos
Mischkowski, Dorothee
Mukherjee, Sumitava
Myrseth, Kristian Ove
Navarro-Martinez, Daniel
Neal, Tess M.S.
Novakova, Julie
Pagà, Roger
Paiva, Tiago O.
Palfi, Bence
Piovesan, Marco
Rahal, Rima-Maria
Salomon, Erika
Srinivasan, Narayanan
Srivastava, Ajita
Szaszi, Barnabas
Szollosi, Aba
Thor, Karoline Ø.
Tinghög, Gustav
Trueblood, Jennifer S.
Van Bavel, J. Jay
van ‘t Veer, Anna E.
Västfjäll, Daniel
Warner, Megan
Wengström, Erik
Wills, Julian
Wollbrant, Conny E.
author_facet Bouwmeester, Samantha
Verkoeijen, Peter P.J.L.
Aczel, Balazs
Barbosa, Fernando
Bègue, Laurent
Brañas-Garza, Pablo
Chmura, Thorsten
Cornelissen, Gert
Døssing, Felix S.
Espín, Antonio M.
Evans, Anthony M.
Ferreira-Santos, Fernando
Fiedler, Susann
Flegr, Jaroslav
Ghaffari, Minou
Glöckner, Andreas
Goeschl, Timo
Guo, Lisa
Hauser, Oliver P.
Hernan-Gonzalez, Roberto
Herrero, Anthony
Horne, Zachary
Houdek, Petr
Johannesson, Magnus
Koppel, Lina
Kujal, Praveen
Laine, Tei
Lohse, Johannes
Martins, Eva C.
Mauro, Carlos
Mischkowski, Dorothee
Mukherjee, Sumitava
Myrseth, Kristian Ove
Navarro-Martinez, Daniel
Neal, Tess M.S.
Novakova, Julie
Pagà, Roger
Paiva, Tiago O.
Palfi, Bence
Piovesan, Marco
Rahal, Rima-Maria
Salomon, Erika
Srinivasan, Narayanan
Srivastava, Ajita
Szaszi, Barnabas
Szollosi, Aba
Thor, Karoline Ø.
Tinghög, Gustav
Trueblood, Jennifer S.
Van Bavel, J. Jay
van ‘t Veer, Anna E.
Västfjäll, Daniel
Warner, Megan
Wengström, Erik
Wills, Julian
Wollbrant, Conny E.
author_sort Bouwmeester, Samantha
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description In an anonymous 4-person economic game, participants contributed more money to a common project (i.e., cooperated) when required to decide quickly than when forced to delay their decision (Rand, Greene & Nowak, 2012), a pattern consistent with the social heuristics hypothesis proposed by Rand and colleagues. The results of studies using time pressure have been mixed, with some replication attempts observing similar patterns (e.g., Rand et al., 2014) and others observing null effects (e.g., Tinghög et al., 2013; Verkoeijen & Bouwmeester, 2014). This Registered Replication Report (RRR) assessed the size and variability of the effect of time pressure on cooperative decisions by combining 21 separate, preregistered replications of the critical conditions from Study 7 of the original article (Rand et al., 2012). The primary planned analysis used data from all participants who were randomly assigned to conditions and who met the protocol inclusion criteria (an intent-to-treat approach that included the 65.9% of participants in the time-pressure condition and 7.5% in the forced-delay condition who did not adhere to the time constraints), and we observed a difference in contributions of −0.37 percentage points compared with an 8.6 percentage point difference calculated from the original data. Analyzing the data as the original article did, including data only for participants who complied with the time constraints, the RRR observed a 10.37 percentage point difference in contributions compared with a 15.31 percentage point difference in the original study. In combination, the results of the intent-to-treat analysis and the compliant-only analysis are consistent with the presence of selection biases and the absence of a causal effect of time pressure on cooperation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:46:02Z
format Article
id nottingham-41615
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:46:02Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Sage
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-416152020-05-04T18:32:11Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41615/ Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012) Bouwmeester, Samantha Verkoeijen, Peter P.J.L. Aczel, Balazs Barbosa, Fernando Bègue, Laurent Brañas-Garza, Pablo Chmura, Thorsten Cornelissen, Gert Døssing, Felix S. Espín, Antonio M. Evans, Anthony M. Ferreira-Santos, Fernando Fiedler, Susann Flegr, Jaroslav Ghaffari, Minou Glöckner, Andreas Goeschl, Timo Guo, Lisa Hauser, Oliver P. Hernan-Gonzalez, Roberto Herrero, Anthony Horne, Zachary Houdek, Petr Johannesson, Magnus Koppel, Lina Kujal, Praveen Laine, Tei Lohse, Johannes Martins, Eva C. Mauro, Carlos Mischkowski, Dorothee Mukherjee, Sumitava Myrseth, Kristian Ove Navarro-Martinez, Daniel Neal, Tess M.S. Novakova, Julie Pagà, Roger Paiva, Tiago O. Palfi, Bence Piovesan, Marco Rahal, Rima-Maria Salomon, Erika Srinivasan, Narayanan Srivastava, Ajita Szaszi, Barnabas Szollosi, Aba Thor, Karoline Ø. Tinghög, Gustav Trueblood, Jennifer S. Van Bavel, J. Jay van ‘t Veer, Anna E. Västfjäll, Daniel Warner, Megan Wengström, Erik Wills, Julian Wollbrant, Conny E. In an anonymous 4-person economic game, participants contributed more money to a common project (i.e., cooperated) when required to decide quickly than when forced to delay their decision (Rand, Greene & Nowak, 2012), a pattern consistent with the social heuristics hypothesis proposed by Rand and colleagues. The results of studies using time pressure have been mixed, with some replication attempts observing similar patterns (e.g., Rand et al., 2014) and others observing null effects (e.g., Tinghög et al., 2013; Verkoeijen & Bouwmeester, 2014). This Registered Replication Report (RRR) assessed the size and variability of the effect of time pressure on cooperative decisions by combining 21 separate, preregistered replications of the critical conditions from Study 7 of the original article (Rand et al., 2012). The primary planned analysis used data from all participants who were randomly assigned to conditions and who met the protocol inclusion criteria (an intent-to-treat approach that included the 65.9% of participants in the time-pressure condition and 7.5% in the forced-delay condition who did not adhere to the time constraints), and we observed a difference in contributions of −0.37 percentage points compared with an 8.6 percentage point difference calculated from the original data. Analyzing the data as the original article did, including data only for participants who complied with the time constraints, the RRR observed a 10.37 percentage point difference in contributions compared with a 15.31 percentage point difference in the original study. In combination, the results of the intent-to-treat analysis and the compliant-only analysis are consistent with the presence of selection biases and the absence of a causal effect of time pressure on cooperation. Sage 2017-03-01 Article PeerReviewed Bouwmeester, Samantha, Verkoeijen, Peter P.J.L., Aczel, Balazs, Barbosa, Fernando, Bègue, Laurent, Brañas-Garza, Pablo, Chmura, Thorsten, Cornelissen, Gert, Døssing, Felix S., Espín, Antonio M., Evans, Anthony M., Ferreira-Santos, Fernando, Fiedler, Susann, Flegr, Jaroslav, Ghaffari, Minou, Glöckner, Andreas, Goeschl, Timo, Guo, Lisa, Hauser, Oliver P., Hernan-Gonzalez, Roberto, Herrero, Anthony, Horne, Zachary, Houdek, Petr, Johannesson, Magnus, Koppel, Lina, Kujal, Praveen, Laine, Tei, Lohse, Johannes, Martins, Eva C., Mauro, Carlos, Mischkowski, Dorothee, Mukherjee, Sumitava, Myrseth, Kristian Ove, Navarro-Martinez, Daniel, Neal, Tess M.S., Novakova, Julie, Pagà, Roger, Paiva, Tiago O., Palfi, Bence, Piovesan, Marco, Rahal, Rima-Maria, Salomon, Erika, Srinivasan, Narayanan, Srivastava, Ajita, Szaszi, Barnabas, Szollosi, Aba, Thor, Karoline Ø., Tinghög, Gustav, Trueblood, Jennifer S., Van Bavel, J. Jay, van ‘t Veer, Anna E., Västfjäll, Daniel, Warner, Megan, Wengström, Erik, Wills, Julian and Wollbrant, Conny E. (2017) Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science . ISSN 1745-6924 Cooperation Social heuristic hypothesis Decision making Economic games Social psychology Replication http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691617693624 doi:10.1177/1745691617693624 doi:10.1177/1745691617693624
spellingShingle Cooperation
Social heuristic hypothesis
Decision making
Economic games
Social psychology
Replication
Bouwmeester, Samantha
Verkoeijen, Peter P.J.L.
Aczel, Balazs
Barbosa, Fernando
Bègue, Laurent
Brañas-Garza, Pablo
Chmura, Thorsten
Cornelissen, Gert
Døssing, Felix S.
Espín, Antonio M.
Evans, Anthony M.
Ferreira-Santos, Fernando
Fiedler, Susann
Flegr, Jaroslav
Ghaffari, Minou
Glöckner, Andreas
Goeschl, Timo
Guo, Lisa
Hauser, Oliver P.
Hernan-Gonzalez, Roberto
Herrero, Anthony
Horne, Zachary
Houdek, Petr
Johannesson, Magnus
Koppel, Lina
Kujal, Praveen
Laine, Tei
Lohse, Johannes
Martins, Eva C.
Mauro, Carlos
Mischkowski, Dorothee
Mukherjee, Sumitava
Myrseth, Kristian Ove
Navarro-Martinez, Daniel
Neal, Tess M.S.
Novakova, Julie
Pagà, Roger
Paiva, Tiago O.
Palfi, Bence
Piovesan, Marco
Rahal, Rima-Maria
Salomon, Erika
Srinivasan, Narayanan
Srivastava, Ajita
Szaszi, Barnabas
Szollosi, Aba
Thor, Karoline Ø.
Tinghög, Gustav
Trueblood, Jennifer S.
Van Bavel, J. Jay
van ‘t Veer, Anna E.
Västfjäll, Daniel
Warner, Megan
Wengström, Erik
Wills, Julian
Wollbrant, Conny E.
Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012)
title Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012)
title_full Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012)
title_fullStr Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012)
title_full_unstemmed Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012)
title_short Registered replication report: Rand, Greene & Nowak (2012)
title_sort registered replication report: rand, greene & nowak (2012)
topic Cooperation
Social heuristic hypothesis
Decision making
Economic games
Social psychology
Replication
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41615/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41615/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41615/