Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems

Degradation of asphalt pavements is an inevitable phenomenon due to the combined effects of high traffic loads and harsh environmental conditions. Deterioration can be in the form of cohesive failure of the bitumen and/or bitumen-filler mastic or by adhesive failure between bitumen and aggregate. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Jizhe, Airey, Gordon D., Grenfell, James R.A.
Format: Article
Published: Springer 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41468/
_version_ 1848796280484003840
author Zhang, Jizhe
Airey, Gordon D.
Grenfell, James R.A.
author_facet Zhang, Jizhe
Airey, Gordon D.
Grenfell, James R.A.
author_sort Zhang, Jizhe
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Degradation of asphalt pavements is an inevitable phenomenon due to the combined effects of high traffic loads and harsh environmental conditions. Deterioration can be in the form of cohesive failure of the bitumen and/or bitumen-filler mastic or by adhesive failure between bitumen and aggregate. This paper presents an experimental investigation to characterise the cohesive and adhesive strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate samples. The pneumatic adhesion tensile testing instrument test and the peel test were used to quantify the tensile fracture strength and fracture energy of different bitumen-aggregate combinations, with a view to analyse the influence of several parameters on the strength of the bitumen film or bitumen-aggregate interface. From the experimental results, harder (40/60 pen) bitumen tends to show much higher tensile strength and fracture energy than softer (70/100 pen) bitumen. Tensile strength is shown to be sensitive to testing temperature with the failure regime changing from cohesive to mixed cohesive/adhesive failure with decreasing temperature. In addition, the results show that aggregate properties do not influence the bonding strength if cohesive failure occurs, but with adhesive failure, granite aggregate tends to produce a higher bonding strength than limestone aggregate in the dry condition. In terms of the peel test, the fracture energy experienced an increasing trend with increasing film thickness. However, the normalised toughness decreased when film thickness increased from 0.2 to 0.9 mm.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:45:28Z
format Article
id nottingham-41468
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:45:28Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-414682020-05-04T17:54:21Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41468/ Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems Zhang, Jizhe Airey, Gordon D. Grenfell, James R.A. Degradation of asphalt pavements is an inevitable phenomenon due to the combined effects of high traffic loads and harsh environmental conditions. Deterioration can be in the form of cohesive failure of the bitumen and/or bitumen-filler mastic or by adhesive failure between bitumen and aggregate. This paper presents an experimental investigation to characterise the cohesive and adhesive strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate samples. The pneumatic adhesion tensile testing instrument test and the peel test were used to quantify the tensile fracture strength and fracture energy of different bitumen-aggregate combinations, with a view to analyse the influence of several parameters on the strength of the bitumen film or bitumen-aggregate interface. From the experimental results, harder (40/60 pen) bitumen tends to show much higher tensile strength and fracture energy than softer (70/100 pen) bitumen. Tensile strength is shown to be sensitive to testing temperature with the failure regime changing from cohesive to mixed cohesive/adhesive failure with decreasing temperature. In addition, the results show that aggregate properties do not influence the bonding strength if cohesive failure occurs, but with adhesive failure, granite aggregate tends to produce a higher bonding strength than limestone aggregate in the dry condition. In terms of the peel test, the fracture energy experienced an increasing trend with increasing film thickness. However, the normalised toughness decreased when film thickness increased from 0.2 to 0.9 mm. Springer 2016-07-01 Article PeerReviewed Zhang, Jizhe, Airey, Gordon D. and Grenfell, James R.A. (2016) Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems. Materials and Structures, 49 (7). pp. 2653-2667. ISSN 1359-5997 Tensile fracture strength Fracture energy Peel test Bitumen Adhesion Cohesion http://link.springer.com/article/10.1617%2Fs11527-015-0674-7 doi:10.1617/s11527-015-0674-7 doi:10.1617/s11527-015-0674-7
spellingShingle Tensile fracture strength
Fracture energy
Peel test
Bitumen
Adhesion
Cohesion
Zhang, Jizhe
Airey, Gordon D.
Grenfell, James R.A.
Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems
title Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems
title_full Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems
title_fullStr Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems
title_full_unstemmed Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems
title_short Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems
title_sort experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems
topic Tensile fracture strength
Fracture energy
Peel test
Bitumen
Adhesion
Cohesion
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41468/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41468/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41468/