Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests

Moisture damage in asphalt mixtures is a complicated mode of pavement distress that results in the loss of stiffness and structural strength of the asphalt pavement layers. This paper evaluated the moisture sensitivity of different aggregate–bitumen combinations through three different approaches: s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Jizhe, Airey, Gordon D., Grenfell, James, Apeagyei, Alex K.
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41324/
_version_ 1848796248768774144
author Zhang, Jizhe
Airey, Gordon D.
Grenfell, James
Apeagyei, Alex K.
author_facet Zhang, Jizhe
Airey, Gordon D.
Grenfell, James
Apeagyei, Alex K.
author_sort Zhang, Jizhe
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Moisture damage in asphalt mixtures is a complicated mode of pavement distress that results in the loss of stiffness and structural strength of the asphalt pavement layers. This paper evaluated the moisture sensitivity of different aggregate–bitumen combinations through three different approaches: surface energy, peel adhesion and the Saturation Ageing Tensile Stiffness (SATS) tests. In addition, the results obtained from these three tests were compared so as to characterise the relationship between the thermodynamic and the mechanical tests. The surface energy tests showed that the work of adhesion in dry conditions was bitumen type dependent, which is in agreement with the peel test. After moisture damage, all of these three tests found that the moisture sensitivity of aggregate–bitumen combinations were mainly aggregate type dependent. Based on the peel test, the moisture absorption and mineralogical compositions of aggregate were considered as two important factors to moisture sensitivity. This phenomenon suggests that in a susceptible asphalt mixture, the effect of aggregate may be more influential than the effect of bitumen. The SATS test and the peel test showed similar moisture sensitivity results demonstrating the good correlation between these two mechanical tests. However, the surface energy tests and the mechanical tests cannot correlate in terms of moisture sensitivity evaluation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:44:58Z
format Article
id nottingham-41324
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:44:58Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-413242020-05-04T19:53:40Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41324/ Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests Zhang, Jizhe Airey, Gordon D. Grenfell, James Apeagyei, Alex K. Moisture damage in asphalt mixtures is a complicated mode of pavement distress that results in the loss of stiffness and structural strength of the asphalt pavement layers. This paper evaluated the moisture sensitivity of different aggregate–bitumen combinations through three different approaches: surface energy, peel adhesion and the Saturation Ageing Tensile Stiffness (SATS) tests. In addition, the results obtained from these three tests were compared so as to characterise the relationship between the thermodynamic and the mechanical tests. The surface energy tests showed that the work of adhesion in dry conditions was bitumen type dependent, which is in agreement with the peel test. After moisture damage, all of these three tests found that the moisture sensitivity of aggregate–bitumen combinations were mainly aggregate type dependent. Based on the peel test, the moisture absorption and mineralogical compositions of aggregate were considered as two important factors to moisture sensitivity. This phenomenon suggests that in a susceptible asphalt mixture, the effect of aggregate may be more influential than the effect of bitumen. The SATS test and the peel test showed similar moisture sensitivity results demonstrating the good correlation between these two mechanical tests. However, the surface energy tests and the mechanical tests cannot correlate in terms of moisture sensitivity evaluation. Taylor & Francis 2018 Article PeerReviewed Zhang, Jizhe, Airey, Gordon D., Grenfell, James and Apeagyei, Alex K. (2018) Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 19 (1). pp. 120-138. ISSN 1468-0629 asphalt mixture surface energy peel test SATS moisture damage http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14680629.2016.1249510 doi:10.1080/14680629.2016.1249510 doi:10.1080/14680629.2016.1249510
spellingShingle asphalt mixture
surface energy
peel test
SATS
moisture damage
Zhang, Jizhe
Airey, Gordon D.
Grenfell, James
Apeagyei, Alex K.
Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests
title Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests
title_full Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests
title_fullStr Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests
title_full_unstemmed Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests
title_short Moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests
title_sort moisture sensitivity examination of asphalt mixtures using thermodynamic, direct adhesion peel and compacted mixture mechanical tests
topic asphalt mixture
surface energy
peel test
SATS
moisture damage
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41324/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41324/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41324/