Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue

Fatigue, which is the central symptom of CFS/ME, is notoriously difficult to define. We describe an investigation in which we raise two questions. First, does the way people use fatigue-related language reflect distinctive patterns? Second, is there a particular pattern characteristic of CFS/ME? The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Standen, Penny, Ward, Christopher D., Saunders, Laura, Beer, Charlotte
Format: Book Section
Published: Palgrave Macmillan 2015
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41275/
_version_ 1848796236934545408
author Standen, Penny
Ward, Christopher D.
Saunders, Laura
Beer, Charlotte
author2 Ward, Christopher D.
author_facet Ward, Christopher D.
Standen, Penny
Ward, Christopher D.
Saunders, Laura
Beer, Charlotte
author_sort Standen, Penny
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Fatigue, which is the central symptom of CFS/ME, is notoriously difficult to define. We describe an investigation in which we raise two questions. First, does the way people use fatigue-related language reflect distinctive patterns? Second, is there a particular pattern characteristic of CFS/ME? These questions can be asked with various theories of language and meaning in mind, as we discuss. Our orientation is towards the intersubjective realities revealed by language, rather than towards the neurological substrate of fatigue. We created a questionnaire including 105 items connected with the experience of fatigue. We then compared responses in samples of adults fulfilling clinical criteria for three conditions in which fatigue is described: CFS/ME, Parkinson ’s disease, and multiple sclerosis. Principal components factor analysis of the three groups together did suggest patterns that we think reflect different intersubjective realities connected with fatigue-related language. In the CFS/ME group, cluster analysis showed that the pattern of responses differed significantly from the other two diagnostic groups. Cluster analysis does not reveal the nature of differences but the CFS/ME respondents marked a higher number of questionnaire items as ‘exactly how I feel ’. We suggest that the language used by people diagnosed with CFS/ME represents less localised experiences than in the other two diagnoses. In the interpretation of symptoms it is helpful to make a distinction between a generalised feeling and an experience that is more readily localised in time and space.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:44:47Z
format Book Section
id nottingham-41275
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:44:47Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Palgrave Macmillan
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-412752020-05-04T17:13:32Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41275/ Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue Standen, Penny Ward, Christopher D. Saunders, Laura Beer, Charlotte Fatigue, which is the central symptom of CFS/ME, is notoriously difficult to define. We describe an investigation in which we raise two questions. First, does the way people use fatigue-related language reflect distinctive patterns? Second, is there a particular pattern characteristic of CFS/ME? These questions can be asked with various theories of language and meaning in mind, as we discuss. Our orientation is towards the intersubjective realities revealed by language, rather than towards the neurological substrate of fatigue. We created a questionnaire including 105 items connected with the experience of fatigue. We then compared responses in samples of adults fulfilling clinical criteria for three conditions in which fatigue is described: CFS/ME, Parkinson ’s disease, and multiple sclerosis. Principal components factor analysis of the three groups together did suggest patterns that we think reflect different intersubjective realities connected with fatigue-related language. In the CFS/ME group, cluster analysis showed that the pattern of responses differed significantly from the other two diagnostic groups. Cluster analysis does not reveal the nature of differences but the CFS/ME respondents marked a higher number of questionnaire items as ‘exactly how I feel ’. We suggest that the language used by people diagnosed with CFS/ME represents less localised experiences than in the other two diagnoses. In the interpretation of symptoms it is helpful to make a distinction between a generalised feeling and an experience that is more readily localised in time and space. Palgrave Macmillan Ward, Christopher D. 2015-07-08 Book Section PeerReviewed Standen, Penny, Ward, Christopher D., Saunders, Laura and Beer, Charlotte (2015) Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue. In: Meanings of ME: interpersonal and social dimensions of chronic fatigue. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 67-85. ISBN 9781349691296 https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467324_6 doi:10.1057/9781137467324_6 doi:10.1057/9781137467324_6
spellingShingle Standen, Penny
Ward, Christopher D.
Saunders, Laura
Beer, Charlotte
Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue
title Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue
title_full Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue
title_fullStr Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue
title_full_unstemmed Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue
title_short Symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue
title_sort symptoms into words: how medical patients talk about fatigue
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41275/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41275/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/41275/