Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited

In a recent paper, Alipranti et al. (2014, Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market, Economics Letters, 124: 122-126) show that, in a vertically related market, Cournot competition yields higher social welfare than Bertrand competition if the upstream firm subsidises the downstr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basak, Debasmita, Mukherjee, Arijit
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40452/
_version_ 1848796060196012032
author Basak, Debasmita
Mukherjee, Arijit
author_facet Basak, Debasmita
Mukherjee, Arijit
author_sort Basak, Debasmita
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description In a recent paper, Alipranti et al. (2014, Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market, Economics Letters, 124: 122-126) show that, in a vertically related market, Cournot competition yields higher social welfare than Bertrand competition if the upstream firm subsidises the downstream firm’s production via negative wholesale input prices. However, the assumption of a negative input price is not economically viable as it encourages the downstream firms to buy an unbounded amount of inputs. We show that the welfare ranking is reversed once we introduce a non-negativity constraint on the input prices
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:41:58Z
format Article
id nottingham-40452
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:41:58Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-404522020-05-04T18:43:26Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40452/ Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited Basak, Debasmita Mukherjee, Arijit In a recent paper, Alipranti et al. (2014, Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market, Economics Letters, 124: 122-126) show that, in a vertically related market, Cournot competition yields higher social welfare than Bertrand competition if the upstream firm subsidises the downstream firm’s production via negative wholesale input prices. However, the assumption of a negative input price is not economically viable as it encourages the downstream firms to buy an unbounded amount of inputs. We show that the welfare ranking is reversed once we introduce a non-negativity constraint on the input prices Elsevier 2017-04-30 Article PeerReviewed Basak, Debasmita and Mukherjee, Arijit (2017) Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited. Economics Letters, 153 . pp. 12-14. ISSN 0165-1765 Bargaining; Bertrand; Cournot; Two-part tariffs; Vertical pricing; Welfare http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176517300320 doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2017.01.021 doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2017.01.021
spellingShingle Bargaining; Bertrand; Cournot; Two-part tariffs; Vertical pricing; Welfare
Basak, Debasmita
Mukherjee, Arijit
Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited
title Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited
title_full Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited
title_fullStr Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited
title_full_unstemmed Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited
title_short Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited
title_sort price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market revisited
topic Bargaining; Bertrand; Cournot; Two-part tariffs; Vertical pricing; Welfare
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40452/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40452/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40452/