Decision making in mental health team meetings

Background: Single point of access meetings represent a critical juncture in the lives of mental health clients. The decision-making process undertaken by mental health professionals during this time is therefore crucial. Method: Glaserian grounded theory, with observations and interviews through...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
Format: Article
Published: RCN Publishing 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40229/
_version_ 1848796011986681856
author Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
author_facet Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
author_sort Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Single point of access meetings represent a critical juncture in the lives of mental health clients. The decision-making process undertaken by mental health professionals during this time is therefore crucial. Method: Glaserian grounded theory, with observations and interviews through theoretical sampling, was used to investigate the decision making of attendees. Findings: A basic social process named handling role boundaries emerged, consisting of four phases: recognising, positioning, weighing up and balancing. Conclusion: Handling role boundaries is an innovative, sociological theory that allows conceptual understanding to show how personality traits contribute to the discussions and decisions, as well as professional roles. These need to be managed effectively to make decisions in a limited time frame. Handling role boundaries explains how this is done in a local mental health trust.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:41:12Z
format Article
id nottingham-40229
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:41:12Z
publishDate 2016
publisher RCN Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-402292020-05-04T17:42:24Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40229/ Decision making in mental health team meetings Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay Background: Single point of access meetings represent a critical juncture in the lives of mental health clients. The decision-making process undertaken by mental health professionals during this time is therefore crucial. Method: Glaserian grounded theory, with observations and interviews through theoretical sampling, was used to investigate the decision making of attendees. Findings: A basic social process named handling role boundaries emerged, consisting of four phases: recognising, positioning, weighing up and balancing. Conclusion: Handling role boundaries is an innovative, sociological theory that allows conceptual understanding to show how personality traits contribute to the discussions and decisions, as well as professional roles. These need to be managed effectively to make decisions in a limited time frame. Handling role boundaries explains how this is done in a local mental health trust. RCN Publishing 2016-03-09 Article PeerReviewed Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay (2016) Decision making in mental health team meetings. Mental Health Practice, 19 (6). pp. 32-38. ISSN 1465-8720 Mental health; Multidisciplinary team meetings; Role boundaries; Grounded theory; Glaserian grounded theory; Sociology http://journals.rcni.com/doi/abs/10.7748/mhp.19.6.32.s21 doi:10.7748/mhp.19.6.32.s21 doi:10.7748/mhp.19.6.32.s21
spellingShingle Mental health; Multidisciplinary team meetings; Role boundaries; Grounded theory; Glaserian grounded theory; Sociology
Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
Decision making in mental health team meetings
title Decision making in mental health team meetings
title_full Decision making in mental health team meetings
title_fullStr Decision making in mental health team meetings
title_full_unstemmed Decision making in mental health team meetings
title_short Decision making in mental health team meetings
title_sort decision making in mental health team meetings
topic Mental health; Multidisciplinary team meetings; Role boundaries; Grounded theory; Glaserian grounded theory; Sociology
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40229/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40229/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40229/