Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory

My PhD study which began in 2009 focused on the decision-making behaviors of mental health professionals, as they attended a “Single Point of Access” meeting. These meetings are set in community mental health services and involve professionals from an array of professional backgrounds discussing cli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
Format: Other
Published: SAGE 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40228/
_version_ 1848796011647991808
author Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
author_facet Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
author_sort Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description My PhD study which began in 2009 focused on the decision-making behaviors of mental health professionals, as they attended a “Single Point of Access” meeting. These meetings are set in community mental health services and involve professionals from an array of professional backgrounds discussing client cases, based on received letters from general practitioners. The general practitioners write these letters seeking advice and direction as to which mental health services the client should be sent to, in response to their needs. On occasions, some general practitioner letters are addressed to a specific person attending the meeting; at other times, they are addressed generally to the whole team. The Single Point of Access meetings house community mental health team members and representatives from more specialized services. The business and interactions of this collection of multidisciplinary professionals provided a useful opportunity to apply a classical grounded theory approach. With Single Point of Access meetings being relatively new at the time of study, discovering, describing, and conceptualizing the decision-making process inherent in these meetings were exciting prospects. After 4 years of study, I produced a grounded theory from my data collection and analysis, which was named “Handling Role Boundaries,” highlighting how these professionals manage and work with multiple roles to bring out the strength of the team and expedite the decision-making process. This case study conveys my personal journey from copious data to Handling Role Boundaries. I present the journey as a learning process, denoted in an “ABCD” format.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:41:12Z
format Other
id nottingham-40228
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:41:12Z
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-402282020-05-04T18:29:04Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40228/ Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay My PhD study which began in 2009 focused on the decision-making behaviors of mental health professionals, as they attended a “Single Point of Access” meeting. These meetings are set in community mental health services and involve professionals from an array of professional backgrounds discussing client cases, based on received letters from general practitioners. The general practitioners write these letters seeking advice and direction as to which mental health services the client should be sent to, in response to their needs. On occasions, some general practitioner letters are addressed to a specific person attending the meeting; at other times, they are addressed generally to the whole team. The Single Point of Access meetings house community mental health team members and representatives from more specialized services. The business and interactions of this collection of multidisciplinary professionals provided a useful opportunity to apply a classical grounded theory approach. With Single Point of Access meetings being relatively new at the time of study, discovering, describing, and conceptualizing the decision-making process inherent in these meetings were exciting prospects. After 4 years of study, I produced a grounded theory from my data collection and analysis, which was named “Handling Role Boundaries,” highlighting how these professionals manage and work with multiple roles to bring out the strength of the team and expedite the decision-making process. This case study conveys my personal journey from copious data to Handling Role Boundaries. I present the journey as a learning process, denoted in an “ABCD” format. SAGE 2017-01-31 Other NonPeerReviewed Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay (2017) Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory. SAGE, London. Research methods; Research methodology; Grounded theory; Glaserian grounded theory; Classical grounded theory; Mental health http://methods.sagepub.com/case/cracking-code-personal-journey-learning-glaserian-grounded-theory doi:10.4135/9781526411532 doi:10.4135/9781526411532
spellingShingle Research methods; Research methodology; Grounded theory; Glaserian grounded theory; Classical grounded theory; Mental health
Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory
title Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory
title_full Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory
title_fullStr Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory
title_full_unstemmed Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory
title_short Cracking the code: a personal journey of learning Glaserian grounded theory
title_sort cracking the code: a personal journey of learning glaserian grounded theory
topic Research methods; Research methodology; Grounded theory; Glaserian grounded theory; Classical grounded theory; Mental health
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40228/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40228/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40228/