Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial

Purpose. (1) to assess the responsiveness of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and Patient Generated Index (PGI) in people with knee pain who were given oral analgesics; and (2) to perform content analysis of the SF-36 and PGI aiming to identify differences between the instruments and causes o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Papou, Alex, Hussain, Salma, McWilliams, Daniel F., Zhang, Weiya, Doherty, Michael
Format: Article
Published: Springer International Publishing 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40172/
_version_ 1848796000135675904
author Papou, Alex
Hussain, Salma
McWilliams, Daniel F.
Zhang, Weiya
Doherty, Michael
author_facet Papou, Alex
Hussain, Salma
McWilliams, Daniel F.
Zhang, Weiya
Doherty, Michael
author_sort Papou, Alex
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose. (1) to assess the responsiveness of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and Patient Generated Index (PGI) in people with knee pain who were given oral analgesics; and (2) to perform content analysis of the SF-36 and PGI aiming to identify differences between the instruments and causes of different responsiveness. Methods. An observational study nested within a randomised controlled trial comparing oral paracetamol, ibuprofen or a combination of the two in 884 community-derived people with chronic knee pain. Each participant was given the SF-36 and PGI questionnaires to fill out at baseline, day 10, week 7 and week 13 after commencement on analgesia. Responsiveness was measured as a standardised response mean from baseline and contents of the instruments were analysed. Results. The PGI showed the greater responsiveness to analgesics than the SF-36 throughout the study period. Only the Bodily Pain Score of the SF-36 showed comparable responsiveness to the PGI. The standardised response mean of the PGI at 13 weeks was 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.72), and that of the Bodily Pain Score of the SF-36 was 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.58). Content analysis of the PGI identified multiple areas which are not represented in the SF-36 which may help explain its performance. Conclusions. Overall the PGI is more responsive than the SF-36 to commonly used oral analgesics taken for knee pain. The PGI is able to elicit areas of individualised health related quality of life which are not captured by the SF-36.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:41:01Z
format Article
id nottingham-40172
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:41:01Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-401722020-05-04T18:25:16Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40172/ Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial Papou, Alex Hussain, Salma McWilliams, Daniel F. Zhang, Weiya Doherty, Michael Purpose. (1) to assess the responsiveness of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and Patient Generated Index (PGI) in people with knee pain who were given oral analgesics; and (2) to perform content analysis of the SF-36 and PGI aiming to identify differences between the instruments and causes of different responsiveness. Methods. An observational study nested within a randomised controlled trial comparing oral paracetamol, ibuprofen or a combination of the two in 884 community-derived people with chronic knee pain. Each participant was given the SF-36 and PGI questionnaires to fill out at baseline, day 10, week 7 and week 13 after commencement on analgesia. Responsiveness was measured as a standardised response mean from baseline and contents of the instruments were analysed. Results. The PGI showed the greater responsiveness to analgesics than the SF-36 throughout the study period. Only the Bodily Pain Score of the SF-36 showed comparable responsiveness to the PGI. The standardised response mean of the PGI at 13 weeks was 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.72), and that of the Bodily Pain Score of the SF-36 was 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.58). Content analysis of the PGI identified multiple areas which are not represented in the SF-36 which may help explain its performance. Conclusions. Overall the PGI is more responsive than the SF-36 to commonly used oral analgesics taken for knee pain. The PGI is able to elicit areas of individualised health related quality of life which are not captured by the SF-36. Springer International Publishing 2016-12-19 Article PeerReviewed Papou, Alex, Hussain, Salma, McWilliams, Daniel F., Zhang, Weiya and Doherty, Michael (2016) Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial. Quality of Life Research . ISSN 1573-2649 knee pain osteoarthritis SF-36 Patient Generated Index responsiveness health-related quality of life http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11136-016-1484-2 doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1484-2 doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1484-2
spellingShingle knee pain
osteoarthritis
SF-36
Patient Generated Index
responsiveness
health-related quality of life
Papou, Alex
Hussain, Salma
McWilliams, Daniel F.
Zhang, Weiya
Doherty, Michael
Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial
title Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial
title_full Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial
title_short Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial
title_sort responsiveness of sf-36 health survey and patient generated index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial
topic knee pain
osteoarthritis
SF-36
Patient Generated Index
responsiveness
health-related quality of life
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40172/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40172/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40172/