Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study

Background Given links between sedentary behaviour and unfavourable health outcomes, there is a need to understand the influence of socio-demographic factors on sedentary behaviour to inform effective interventions. This study examined domain-specific sitting times reported across socio-demographic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clemes, Stacy, Houdmont, Jonathan, Munir, Fehmidah, Wilson, Kelly, Kerr, Robert, Addley, Ken
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40014/
_version_ 1848795966778376192
author Clemes, Stacy
Houdmont, Jonathan
Munir, Fehmidah
Wilson, Kelly
Kerr, Robert
Addley, Ken
author_facet Clemes, Stacy
Houdmont, Jonathan
Munir, Fehmidah
Wilson, Kelly
Kerr, Robert
Addley, Ken
author_sort Clemes, Stacy
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background Given links between sedentary behaviour and unfavourable health outcomes, there is a need to understand the influence of socio-demographic factors on sedentary behaviour to inform effective interventions. This study examined domain-specific sitting times reported across socio-demographic groups of office workers. Methods The analyses are cross-sectional and based on a survey conducted within the Stormont Study, which is tracking employees in the Northern Ireland Civil Service. Participants self-reported their daily sitting times across multiple domains (work, TV, travel, PC use and leisure) on workdays and non-workdays, along with their physical activity and socio-demographic variables (sex, age, marital status, BMI, educational attainment and work pattern). Total and domain-specific sitting on workdays and non-workdays were compared across socio-demographic groups using multivariate analyses of covariance. Results Completed responses were obtained from 4436 participants. For the whole sample, total daily sitting times were higher on workdays in comparison to non-workdays (625 ± 168 versus 469 ± 210 min/day, P < 0.001). On workdays and non-workdays, higher sitting times were reported by individuals aged 18–29 years, obese individuals, full-time workers and single/divorced/widowed individuals (P < 0.001). Conclusions Interventions are needed to combat the high levels of sedentary behaviour observed in office workers, particularly among the highlighted demographic groups. Interventions should target workplace and leisure-time sitting.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:40:29Z
format Article
id nottingham-40014
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:40:29Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-400142020-05-04T17:39:23Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40014/ Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study Clemes, Stacy Houdmont, Jonathan Munir, Fehmidah Wilson, Kelly Kerr, Robert Addley, Ken Background Given links between sedentary behaviour and unfavourable health outcomes, there is a need to understand the influence of socio-demographic factors on sedentary behaviour to inform effective interventions. This study examined domain-specific sitting times reported across socio-demographic groups of office workers. Methods The analyses are cross-sectional and based on a survey conducted within the Stormont Study, which is tracking employees in the Northern Ireland Civil Service. Participants self-reported their daily sitting times across multiple domains (work, TV, travel, PC use and leisure) on workdays and non-workdays, along with their physical activity and socio-demographic variables (sex, age, marital status, BMI, educational attainment and work pattern). Total and domain-specific sitting on workdays and non-workdays were compared across socio-demographic groups using multivariate analyses of covariance. Results Completed responses were obtained from 4436 participants. For the whole sample, total daily sitting times were higher on workdays in comparison to non-workdays (625 ± 168 versus 469 ± 210 min/day, P < 0.001). On workdays and non-workdays, higher sitting times were reported by individuals aged 18–29 years, obese individuals, full-time workers and single/divorced/widowed individuals (P < 0.001). Conclusions Interventions are needed to combat the high levels of sedentary behaviour observed in office workers, particularly among the highlighted demographic groups. Interventions should target workplace and leisure-time sitting. Oxford University Press 2016-03-31 Article PeerReviewed Clemes, Stacy, Houdmont, Jonathan, Munir, Fehmidah, Wilson, Kelly, Kerr, Robert and Addley, Ken (2016) Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study. Journal of Public Health, 38 (1). pp. 53-60. ISSN 1741-3842 occupational health interventions office workers screen time sedentary behaviour TV viewing https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdu114 doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdu114 doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdu114
spellingShingle occupational health interventions
office workers
screen time
sedentary behaviour
TV viewing
Clemes, Stacy
Houdmont, Jonathan
Munir, Fehmidah
Wilson, Kelly
Kerr, Robert
Addley, Ken
Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study
title Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study
title_full Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study
title_fullStr Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study
title_full_unstemmed Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study
title_short Descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the Stormont Study
title_sort descriptive epidemiology of domain-specific sitting in working adults: the stormont study
topic occupational health interventions
office workers
screen time
sedentary behaviour
TV viewing
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40014/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40014/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/40014/