The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016)

Melchert (2016) argues that knowledge of psychological processes is now grounded in experimental tests of falsifiable theories that support a unified, paradigmatic understanding of human psychology. While his argument for leaving behind our preparadigmatic past of competing theoretical orientations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joseph, Stephen
Format: Article
Published: American Psychological Association 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/39418/
_version_ 1848795832429576192
author Joseph, Stephen
author_facet Joseph, Stephen
author_sort Joseph, Stephen
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Melchert (2016) argues that knowledge of psychological processes is now grounded in experimental tests of falsifiable theories that support a unified, paradigmatic understanding of human psychology. While his argument for leaving behind our preparadigmatic past of competing theoretical orientations is welcome, Melchert (2016) presents a perspective in which the degree to which this is currently possible is overstated. In this comment it is argued that scientific research does not replace paradigmatic assumptions but takes place within them. As such, it is not possible to take the theoretical orientations out of the practice of psychology, which is inevitably an expression of our philosophical assumptions of first principles.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:38:21Z
format Article
id nottingham-39418
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:38:21Z
publishDate 2017
publisher American Psychological Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-394182020-05-04T18:27:15Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/39418/ The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016) Joseph, Stephen Melchert (2016) argues that knowledge of psychological processes is now grounded in experimental tests of falsifiable theories that support a unified, paradigmatic understanding of human psychology. While his argument for leaving behind our preparadigmatic past of competing theoretical orientations is welcome, Melchert (2016) presents a perspective in which the degree to which this is currently possible is overstated. In this comment it is argued that scientific research does not replace paradigmatic assumptions but takes place within them. As such, it is not possible to take the theoretical orientations out of the practice of psychology, which is inevitably an expression of our philosophical assumptions of first principles. American Psychological Association 2017-06-30 Article PeerReviewed Joseph, Stephen (2017) The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016). American Psychologist, 72 (4). pp. 397-398. ISSN 1935-990X Psychological processes Preparadigmatic Theoretical orientations First principles http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000134 doi:10.1037/amp0000134 doi:10.1037/amp0000134
spellingShingle Psychological processes
Preparadigmatic
Theoretical orientations
First principles
Joseph, Stephen
The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016)
title The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016)
title_full The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016)
title_fullStr The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016)
title_full_unstemmed The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016)
title_short The problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on Melchert (2016)
title_sort problem of choosing between irreconcilable theoretical orientations: comment on melchert (2016)
topic Psychological processes
Preparadigmatic
Theoretical orientations
First principles
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/39418/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/39418/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/39418/