Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search

Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This “preview benefit” has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barrett, Doug J.K., Shimozaki, Steven S., Jensen, Silke, Zobay, Oliver
Format: Article
Published: American Psychological Association 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38736/
_version_ 1848795678689460224
author Barrett, Doug J.K.
Shimozaki, Steven S.
Jensen, Silke
Zobay, Oliver
author_facet Barrett, Doug J.K.
Shimozaki, Steven S.
Jensen, Silke
Zobay, Oliver
author_sort Barrett, Doug J.K.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This “preview benefit” has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian Observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in two standard and two preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target’s likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias towards unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:35:55Z
format Article
id nottingham-38736
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:35:55Z
publishDate 2016
publisher American Psychological Association
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-387362020-05-04T17:51:13Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38736/ Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search Barrett, Doug J.K. Shimozaki, Steven S. Jensen, Silke Zobay, Oliver Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This “preview benefit” has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian Observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in two standard and two preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target’s likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias towards unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations. American Psychological Association 2016-05-19 Article PeerReviewed Barrett, Doug J.K., Shimozaki, Steven S., Jensen, Silke and Zobay, Oliver (2016) Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42 (10). pp. 1533-1546. ISSN 1939-1277 Visual search Inhibition Facilitation Integration http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000239 doi:10.1037/xhp0000239 doi:10.1037/xhp0000239
spellingShingle Visual search
Inhibition
Facilitation
Integration
Barrett, Doug J.K.
Shimozaki, Steven S.
Jensen, Silke
Zobay, Oliver
Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search
title Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search
title_full Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search
title_fullStr Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search
title_full_unstemmed Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search
title_short Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search
title_sort visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search
topic Visual search
Inhibition
Facilitation
Integration
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38736/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38736/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38736/