On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils

When dry soils are rewetted a pulse of CO2 is invariably released, and whilst this phenomenon has been studied for decades, the precise origins of this CO2 remain obscure. We postulate that it could be of chemical (i.e. via abiotic pathways), biochemical (via free enzymes) or biological (via intact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fraser, F.C., Corstanje, R., Deeks, L.K., Harris, J.A., Pawlett, M., Todman, L.C., Whitmore, A.P., Ritz, Karl
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38485/
_version_ 1848795621794775040
author Fraser, F.C.
Corstanje, R.
Deeks, L.K.
Harris, J.A.
Pawlett, M.
Todman, L.C.
Whitmore, A.P.
Ritz, Karl
author_facet Fraser, F.C.
Corstanje, R.
Deeks, L.K.
Harris, J.A.
Pawlett, M.
Todman, L.C.
Whitmore, A.P.
Ritz, Karl
author_sort Fraser, F.C.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description When dry soils are rewetted a pulse of CO2 is invariably released, and whilst this phenomenon has been studied for decades, the precise origins of this CO2 remain obscure. We postulate that it could be of chemical (i.e. via abiotic pathways), biochemical (via free enzymes) or biological (via intact cells) origin. To elucidate the relative contributions of the pathways, dry soils were either sterilised (double autoclaving) or treated with solutions of inhibitors (15% trichloroacetic acid or 1% silver nitrate) targeting the different modes. The rapidity of CO2 release from the soils after the drying:rewetting (DRW) cycle was remarkable, with maximal rates of evolution within 6 min, and 41% of the total efflux over 96 h released within the first 24 h. The complete cessation of CO2 eflux following sterilisation showed there was no abiotic (dissolution of carbonates) contribution to the CO2 release on rewetting, and clear evidence for an organismal or biochemical basis to the flush. Rehydration in the presence of inhibitors indicated that there were approximately equal contributions from biochemical (outside membranes) and organismal (inside membranes) sources within the first 24 h after rewetting. This suggests that some of the flux was derived from microbial respiration, whilst the remainder was a consequence of enzyme activity, possibly through remnant respiratory pathways in the debris of dead cells.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:35:00Z
format Article
id nottingham-38485
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:35:00Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-384852020-05-04T18:03:07Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38485/ On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils Fraser, F.C. Corstanje, R. Deeks, L.K. Harris, J.A. Pawlett, M. Todman, L.C. Whitmore, A.P. Ritz, Karl When dry soils are rewetted a pulse of CO2 is invariably released, and whilst this phenomenon has been studied for decades, the precise origins of this CO2 remain obscure. We postulate that it could be of chemical (i.e. via abiotic pathways), biochemical (via free enzymes) or biological (via intact cells) origin. To elucidate the relative contributions of the pathways, dry soils were either sterilised (double autoclaving) or treated with solutions of inhibitors (15% trichloroacetic acid or 1% silver nitrate) targeting the different modes. The rapidity of CO2 release from the soils after the drying:rewetting (DRW) cycle was remarkable, with maximal rates of evolution within 6 min, and 41% of the total efflux over 96 h released within the first 24 h. The complete cessation of CO2 eflux following sterilisation showed there was no abiotic (dissolution of carbonates) contribution to the CO2 release on rewetting, and clear evidence for an organismal or biochemical basis to the flush. Rehydration in the presence of inhibitors indicated that there were approximately equal contributions from biochemical (outside membranes) and organismal (inside membranes) sources within the first 24 h after rewetting. This suggests that some of the flux was derived from microbial respiration, whilst the remainder was a consequence of enzyme activity, possibly through remnant respiratory pathways in the debris of dead cells. Elsevier 2016-07-06 Article PeerReviewed Fraser, F.C., Corstanje, R., Deeks, L.K., Harris, J.A., Pawlett, M., Todman, L.C., Whitmore, A.P. and Ritz, Karl (2016) On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 101 . pp. 1-5. ISSN 0038-0717 Birch effect; Dry:wet cycles; CO2 flux; Extracellular oxidative metabolism; Soil sterilisation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003807171630133X doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.032 doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.032
spellingShingle Birch effect; Dry:wet cycles; CO2 flux; Extracellular oxidative metabolism; Soil sterilisation
Fraser, F.C.
Corstanje, R.
Deeks, L.K.
Harris, J.A.
Pawlett, M.
Todman, L.C.
Whitmore, A.P.
Ritz, Karl
On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils
title On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils
title_full On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils
title_fullStr On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils
title_full_unstemmed On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils
title_short On the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils
title_sort on the origin of carbon dioxide released from rewetted soils
topic Birch effect; Dry:wet cycles; CO2 flux; Extracellular oxidative metabolism; Soil sterilisation
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38485/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38485/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38485/