Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease

This study investigated aspects of the validity and reliability of the 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and its relationship with the shorter 11-item QuickDASH in patients with Dupuytren’s disease. Seven hundred and fifty-nine DASH questionn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigues, J.N., Zhang, Weiya, Scammell, Brigitte E., Russell, P., Chakrabarti, I., Fullilove, S., Davidson, D., Davis, T.
Format: Article
Published: SAGE 2016
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38391/
_version_ 1848795601213325312
author Rodrigues, J.N.
Zhang, Weiya
Scammell, Brigitte E.
Russell, P.
Chakrabarti, I.
Fullilove, S.
Davidson, D.
Davis, T.
author_facet Rodrigues, J.N.
Zhang, Weiya
Scammell, Brigitte E.
Russell, P.
Chakrabarti, I.
Fullilove, S.
Davidson, D.
Davis, T.
author_sort Rodrigues, J.N.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This study investigated aspects of the validity and reliability of the 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and its relationship with the shorter 11-item QuickDASH in patients with Dupuytren’s disease. Seven hundred and fifty-nine DASH questionnaires were studied, covering pre- and postoperative patients undergoing different treatments for Dupuytren’s disease. Items related to pain rose early after treatment before returning to baseline, suggesting that studying pain is relevant during postoperative recovery. Across all 759 sets of responses, the QuickDASH agreed closely with the DASH. In exploratory factor analysis, the DASH was not unidimensional, questioning the validity of the DASH summary score in Dupuytren’s disease. Further validation of existing PROMs for use in Dupuytren’s disease is needed. These data suggest that pain is a relevant symptom to study during postoperative recovery following treatment for Dupuytren’s disease.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:34:41Z
format Article
id nottingham-38391
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:34:41Z
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-383912020-05-04T20:02:15Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38391/ Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease Rodrigues, J.N. Zhang, Weiya Scammell, Brigitte E. Russell, P. Chakrabarti, I. Fullilove, S. Davidson, D. Davis, T. This study investigated aspects of the validity and reliability of the 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and its relationship with the shorter 11-item QuickDASH in patients with Dupuytren’s disease. Seven hundred and fifty-nine DASH questionnaires were studied, covering pre- and postoperative patients undergoing different treatments for Dupuytren’s disease. Items related to pain rose early after treatment before returning to baseline, suggesting that studying pain is relevant during postoperative recovery. Across all 759 sets of responses, the QuickDASH agreed closely with the DASH. In exploratory factor analysis, the DASH was not unidimensional, questioning the validity of the DASH summary score in Dupuytren’s disease. Further validation of existing PROMs for use in Dupuytren’s disease is needed. These data suggest that pain is a relevant symptom to study during postoperative recovery following treatment for Dupuytren’s disease. SAGE 2016-07 Article PeerReviewed Rodrigues, J.N., Zhang, Weiya, Scammell, Brigitte E., Russell, P., Chakrabarti, I., Fullilove, S., Davidson, D. and Davis, T. (2016) Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 41 (6). pp. 589-599. ISSN 2043-6289 http://jhs.sagepub.com/content/41/6/589 doi:10.1177/1753193415601350 doi:10.1177/1753193415601350
spellingShingle Rodrigues, J.N.
Zhang, Weiya
Scammell, Brigitte E.
Russell, P.
Chakrabarti, I.
Fullilove, S.
Davidson, D.
Davis, T.
Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease
title Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease
title_full Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease
title_fullStr Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease
title_short Validity of the disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren’s disease
title_sort validity of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand patient-reported outcome measure (dash) and the quickdash when used in dupuytren’s disease
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38391/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38391/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/38391/