LTDNA evidence on trial

Adopting the interpretative/hermeneutical method typical of much legal scholarship, this article considers two sets of issues pertaining to LTDNA profiles as evidence in criminal proceedings. The section titled Expert Evidence as Forensic Epistemic Warrant addresses some rather large questions about...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roberts, Paul
Format: Article
Published: Frontiers Media 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37900/
_version_ 1848795556404527104
author Roberts, Paul
author_facet Roberts, Paul
author_sort Roberts, Paul
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Adopting the interpretative/hermeneutical method typical of much legal scholarship, this article considers two sets of issues pertaining to LTDNA profiles as evidence in criminal proceedings. The section titled Expert Evidence as Forensic Epistemic Warrant addresses some rather large questions about the epistemic status and probative value of expert testimony in general. It sketches a theoretical model of expert evidence, highlighting five essential criteria: (1) expert competence; (2) disciplinary domain; (3) methodological validity; (4) materiality; and (5) legal admissibility. This generic model of expert authority, highlighting law's fundamentally normative character, applies to all modern forms of criminal adjudication, across Europe and farther afield. The section titled LTDNA Evidence in UK Criminal Trials then examines English and Northern Irish courts' attempts to get to grips with LTDNA evidence in recent cases. Better appreciating the ways in which UK courts have addressed the challenges of LTDNA evidence may offer some insights into parallel developments in other legal systems. Appellate court rulings follow a predictable judicial logic, which might usefully be studied and reflected upon by any forensic scientist or statistician seeking to operate effectively in criminal proceedings. Whilst each legal jurisdiction has its own unique blend of jurisprudence, institutions, cultures and historical traditions, there is considerable scope for comparative analysis and cross-jurisdictional borrowing and instruction. In the spirit of promoting more nuanced and sophisticated international interdisciplinary dialogue, this article examines UK judicial approaches to LTDNA evidence and begins to elucidate their underlying institutional logic. Legal argument and broader policy debates are not confined to considerations of scientific validity, contamination risks and evidential integrity, or associated judgments of legal admissibility or exclusion. They also crucially concern the manner in which LTDNA profiling results are presented and explained to factfinders in criminal trials.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:33:58Z
format Article
id nottingham-37900
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:33:58Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-379002020-05-04T18:15:44Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37900/ LTDNA evidence on trial Roberts, Paul Adopting the interpretative/hermeneutical method typical of much legal scholarship, this article considers two sets of issues pertaining to LTDNA profiles as evidence in criminal proceedings. The section titled Expert Evidence as Forensic Epistemic Warrant addresses some rather large questions about the epistemic status and probative value of expert testimony in general. It sketches a theoretical model of expert evidence, highlighting five essential criteria: (1) expert competence; (2) disciplinary domain; (3) methodological validity; (4) materiality; and (5) legal admissibility. This generic model of expert authority, highlighting law's fundamentally normative character, applies to all modern forms of criminal adjudication, across Europe and farther afield. The section titled LTDNA Evidence in UK Criminal Trials then examines English and Northern Irish courts' attempts to get to grips with LTDNA evidence in recent cases. Better appreciating the ways in which UK courts have addressed the challenges of LTDNA evidence may offer some insights into parallel developments in other legal systems. Appellate court rulings follow a predictable judicial logic, which might usefully be studied and reflected upon by any forensic scientist or statistician seeking to operate effectively in criminal proceedings. Whilst each legal jurisdiction has its own unique blend of jurisprudence, institutions, cultures and historical traditions, there is considerable scope for comparative analysis and cross-jurisdictional borrowing and instruction. In the spirit of promoting more nuanced and sophisticated international interdisciplinary dialogue, this article examines UK judicial approaches to LTDNA evidence and begins to elucidate their underlying institutional logic. Legal argument and broader policy debates are not confined to considerations of scientific validity, contamination risks and evidential integrity, or associated judgments of legal admissibility or exclusion. They also crucially concern the manner in which LTDNA profiling results are presented and explained to factfinders in criminal trials. Frontiers Media 2016-10-25 Article PeerReviewed Roberts, Paul (2016) LTDNA evidence on trial. Frontiers in Genetics, 7 . 180/1-180/13. ISSN 1664-8021 expert evidence criminal adjudication LTDNA profiling evidence comparative criminal procedure Law-Science interdisciplinarity http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2016.00180/full doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00180 doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00180
spellingShingle expert evidence
criminal adjudication
LTDNA profiling evidence
comparative criminal procedure
Law-Science
interdisciplinarity
Roberts, Paul
LTDNA evidence on trial
title LTDNA evidence on trial
title_full LTDNA evidence on trial
title_fullStr LTDNA evidence on trial
title_full_unstemmed LTDNA evidence on trial
title_short LTDNA evidence on trial
title_sort ltdna evidence on trial
topic expert evidence
criminal adjudication
LTDNA profiling evidence
comparative criminal procedure
Law-Science
interdisciplinarity
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37900/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37900/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37900/