What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work

Objective: To investigate whether measurements of junior doctor on-call workload and performance can clarify the mechanisms underlying the increase in morbidity and mortality seen after junior doctor changeover: the ‘August effect’. Design: Quantitative retrospective observational study of routin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blakey, John, Fearn, Andrew, Shaw, Dominick E.
Format: Article
Published: SAGE 2013
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37864/
_version_ 1848795550142431232
author Blakey, John
Fearn, Andrew
Shaw, Dominick E.
author_facet Blakey, John
Fearn, Andrew
Shaw, Dominick E.
author_sort Blakey, John
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: To investigate whether measurements of junior doctor on-call workload and performance can clarify the mechanisms underlying the increase in morbidity and mortality seen after junior doctor changeover: the ‘August effect’. Design: Quantitative retrospective observational study of routinely collected data on junior doctor workload. Setting: Two large teaching hospitals in England. Participants: Task level data from a wireless out of hours system (n = 29,885 requests) used by medical staff, nurses, and allied health professionals. Main outcome measures: Number and type of tasks requested by nurses, time to completion of tasks by junior doctors. Results: There was no overall change in the number of tasks requested by nurses out of hours around the August changeover (median requests per hour 15 before and 14 after, p = 0.46). However, the number of tasks classified as urgent was greater (p = 0.016) equating to five more urgent tasks per day. After changeover, doctors took less time to complete tasks overall due to a reduction in time taken for routine tasks (median 74 vs. 66 min; p = 3.9 × 10−9). Conclusion: This study suggests that the ‘August effect’ is not due to new junior doctors completing tasks more slowly or having a greater workload. Further studies are required to investigate the causes of the increased number of urgent tasks seen, but likely factors are errors, omissions, and poor prioritization. Thus, improved training and quality control has the potential to address this increased duration of unresolved patient risk. The study also highlights the potential of newer technologies to facilitate quantitative study of clinical activity.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:33:52Z
format Article
id nottingham-37864
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:33:52Z
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-378642020-05-04T20:18:56Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37864/ What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work Blakey, John Fearn, Andrew Shaw, Dominick E. Objective: To investigate whether measurements of junior doctor on-call workload and performance can clarify the mechanisms underlying the increase in morbidity and mortality seen after junior doctor changeover: the ‘August effect’. Design: Quantitative retrospective observational study of routinely collected data on junior doctor workload. Setting: Two large teaching hospitals in England. Participants: Task level data from a wireless out of hours system (n = 29,885 requests) used by medical staff, nurses, and allied health professionals. Main outcome measures: Number and type of tasks requested by nurses, time to completion of tasks by junior doctors. Results: There was no overall change in the number of tasks requested by nurses out of hours around the August changeover (median requests per hour 15 before and 14 after, p = 0.46). However, the number of tasks classified as urgent was greater (p = 0.016) equating to five more urgent tasks per day. After changeover, doctors took less time to complete tasks overall due to a reduction in time taken for routine tasks (median 74 vs. 66 min; p = 3.9 × 10−9). Conclusion: This study suggests that the ‘August effect’ is not due to new junior doctors completing tasks more slowly or having a greater workload. Further studies are required to investigate the causes of the increased number of urgent tasks seen, but likely factors are errors, omissions, and poor prioritization. Thus, improved training and quality control has the potential to address this increased duration of unresolved patient risk. The study also highlights the potential of newer technologies to facilitate quantitative study of clinical activity. SAGE 2013-08 Article PeerReviewed Blakey, John, Fearn, Andrew and Shaw, Dominick E. (2013) What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work. JRSM Short Reports, 4 (8). ISSN 2042-5333 http://shr.sagepub.com/content/4/8/2042533313489823 doi:10.1177/2042533313489823 doi:10.1177/2042533313489823
spellingShingle Blakey, John
Fearn, Andrew
Shaw, Dominick E.
What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work
title What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work
title_full What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work
title_fullStr What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work
title_full_unstemmed What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work
title_short What drives the 'August effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work
title_sort what drives the 'august effect'?: an observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37864/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37864/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37864/