Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli

A fundamental task of the visual system is to extract figure-ground boundaries between objects, which are often defined not only by differences in luminance but also by "second order" contrast or texture differences. Responses of cortical neurons to both first- and second order patterns ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hutchinson, Claire V., Ledgeway, Timothy, Baker, Curtis L.,Jr.
Format: Article
Published: Society for Neuroscience 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37539/
_version_ 1848795480382767104
author Hutchinson, Claire V.
Ledgeway, Timothy
Baker, Curtis L.,Jr.
author_facet Hutchinson, Claire V.
Ledgeway, Timothy
Baker, Curtis L.,Jr.
author_sort Hutchinson, Claire V.
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description A fundamental task of the visual system is to extract figure-ground boundaries between objects, which are often defined not only by differences in luminance but also by "second order" contrast or texture differences. Responses of cortical neurons to both first- and second order patterns have been previously studied extensively, but only for responses to either type of stimulus in isolation. Here we examined responses of visual cortex neurons to the spatial relationship between superimposed periodic luminance modulation (LM) and contrast modulation (CM) stimuli, whose contrasts were adjusted to give equated responses when presented alone. Extracellular single unit recordings were made in area 18 of the cat, whose neurons show very similar responses to CM and LM stimuli as those in primate area V2 (Li et al, 2014). Most neurons showed a significant dependence on the relative phase of the combined LM and CM patterns, with a clear overall optimal response when they were approximately phase-aligned. The degree of this phase preference, and the contributions of suppressive and/or facilitatory interactions, varied considerably from one neuron to another. Such phase-dependent and phase-invariant responses were evident in both simple- and complex-type cells. These results place important constraints on any future model of the underlying neural circuitry for second-order responses. The diversity in the degree of phase dependence between LM and CM stimuli that we observe could help disambiguate different kinds of boundaries in natural scenes.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:32:45Z
format Article
id nottingham-37539
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:32:45Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Society for Neuroscience
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-375392020-05-04T18:27:14Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37539/ Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli Hutchinson, Claire V. Ledgeway, Timothy Baker, Curtis L.,Jr. A fundamental task of the visual system is to extract figure-ground boundaries between objects, which are often defined not only by differences in luminance but also by "second order" contrast or texture differences. Responses of cortical neurons to both first- and second order patterns have been previously studied extensively, but only for responses to either type of stimulus in isolation. Here we examined responses of visual cortex neurons to the spatial relationship between superimposed periodic luminance modulation (LM) and contrast modulation (CM) stimuli, whose contrasts were adjusted to give equated responses when presented alone. Extracellular single unit recordings were made in area 18 of the cat, whose neurons show very similar responses to CM and LM stimuli as those in primate area V2 (Li et al, 2014). Most neurons showed a significant dependence on the relative phase of the combined LM and CM patterns, with a clear overall optimal response when they were approximately phase-aligned. The degree of this phase preference, and the contributions of suppressive and/or facilitatory interactions, varied considerably from one neuron to another. Such phase-dependent and phase-invariant responses were evident in both simple- and complex-type cells. These results place important constraints on any future model of the underlying neural circuitry for second-order responses. The diversity in the degree of phase dependence between LM and CM stimuli that we observe could help disambiguate different kinds of boundaries in natural scenes. Society for Neuroscience 2016-12-07 Article PeerReviewed Hutchinson, Claire V., Ledgeway, Timothy and Baker, Curtis L.,Jr. (2016) Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 36 (49). pp. 12328-12337. ISSN 1529-2401 contrast modulation first-order form-cue invariance second-orxder spatial phase visual cortex http://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/49/12328 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1350-16.2016 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1350-16.2016
spellingShingle contrast modulation
first-order
form-cue invariance
second-orxder
spatial phase
visual cortex
Hutchinson, Claire V.
Ledgeway, Timothy
Baker, Curtis L.,Jr.
Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli
title Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli
title_full Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli
title_fullStr Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli
title_short Phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli
title_sort phase-dependent interactions in visual cortex to combinations of first- and second-order stimuli
topic contrast modulation
first-order
form-cue invariance
second-orxder
spatial phase
visual cortex
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37539/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37539/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37539/