Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture

The question this study has asked is, How does the psalmist craft the images of his enemies in the terms of law? In the process of answering, I address three major theses. The first thesis revolves around the observation that the lamenting psalmist tends to follow up his descriptions of the enemies’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van De Wiele, Tarah
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37432/
_version_ 1848795457458798592
author Van De Wiele, Tarah
author_facet Van De Wiele, Tarah
author_sort Van De Wiele, Tarah
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The question this study has asked is, How does the psalmist craft the images of his enemies in the terms of law? In the process of answering, I address three major theses. The first thesis revolves around the observation that the lamenting psalmist tends to follow up his descriptions of the enemies’ wrongs with specific punishments. As this study argues, the psalmist’s muse for that wrong/punishment exchange is his own legal culture. The second thesis is that the psalmist’s calls for violent punishments of his enemies reflect legal norms in his external reality. This is proposed in direct response to the persistent scholarly assumption that the punishments invoked in these psalms are internally born of the psalmists’ fantasies, as well as being confined to that realm. I argue that the psalmist not only draws on legal-cultural punishment norms but in fact depends on their normative status in order to convey to his readers the nature of his enemies’ crimes. The third thesis is that the external reality in question is the ancient Near Eastern legal milieu of which biblical law is a part. Chapter Three shows how the psalmist’s use of talionic language with reference to his enemies happens only when their behaviour is consistent with crimes punished in the “like for like” pattern elsewhere throughout ancient Near Eastern legal history. Chapter Four demonstrates that the psalmist’s description of his enemies as slanderers and as “those who reproach” is framed in a legal-cultural understanding of shame as a sanctioned — and necessary — form of punishment for these crimes. After establishing the primacy of orality in contract procedure, Chapter Five shows how the psalmist’s mouth-focussed punishments assume the nature of contract-making and breaking in ancient Near Eastern law. Underlying these three theses is a theoretical critique of approaches to law in the psalms thus far, which have consistently assumed a definition of law that coheres with a contemporary Western understanding of law but diverges from that of the psalmist. I propose (in Chapter Two) that a definition of law guided by functional criteria, technical meaning, and the observation of norms, is the most fitting for an encounter with the psalmist’s own legal understanding. Taking this approach then allows this study to present the lamenting psalmist as a participant in a legal culture that extends far beyond the confines of the Pentateuch.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:32:24Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-37432
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:32:24Z
publishDate 2016
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-374322025-02-28T13:33:58Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37432/ Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture Van De Wiele, Tarah The question this study has asked is, How does the psalmist craft the images of his enemies in the terms of law? In the process of answering, I address three major theses. The first thesis revolves around the observation that the lamenting psalmist tends to follow up his descriptions of the enemies’ wrongs with specific punishments. As this study argues, the psalmist’s muse for that wrong/punishment exchange is his own legal culture. The second thesis is that the psalmist’s calls for violent punishments of his enemies reflect legal norms in his external reality. This is proposed in direct response to the persistent scholarly assumption that the punishments invoked in these psalms are internally born of the psalmists’ fantasies, as well as being confined to that realm. I argue that the psalmist not only draws on legal-cultural punishment norms but in fact depends on their normative status in order to convey to his readers the nature of his enemies’ crimes. The third thesis is that the external reality in question is the ancient Near Eastern legal milieu of which biblical law is a part. Chapter Three shows how the psalmist’s use of talionic language with reference to his enemies happens only when their behaviour is consistent with crimes punished in the “like for like” pattern elsewhere throughout ancient Near Eastern legal history. Chapter Four demonstrates that the psalmist’s description of his enemies as slanderers and as “those who reproach” is framed in a legal-cultural understanding of shame as a sanctioned — and necessary — form of punishment for these crimes. After establishing the primacy of orality in contract procedure, Chapter Five shows how the psalmist’s mouth-focussed punishments assume the nature of contract-making and breaking in ancient Near Eastern law. Underlying these three theses is a theoretical critique of approaches to law in the psalms thus far, which have consistently assumed a definition of law that coheres with a contemporary Western understanding of law but diverges from that of the psalmist. I propose (in Chapter Two) that a definition of law guided by functional criteria, technical meaning, and the observation of norms, is the most fitting for an encounter with the psalmist’s own legal understanding. Taking this approach then allows this study to present the lamenting psalmist as a participant in a legal culture that extends far beyond the confines of the Pentateuch. 2016-12-14 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37432/1/PhD.final%20copy.whole.pdf Van De Wiele, Tarah (2016) Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Psalms Hebrew Bible Law Crime Punishment Talion Shame Honour Retribution Theology Law and Literature
spellingShingle Psalms
Hebrew Bible
Law
Crime
Punishment
Talion
Shame
Honour
Retribution
Theology
Law and Literature
Van De Wiele, Tarah
Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture
title Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture
title_full Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture
title_fullStr Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture
title_full_unstemmed Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture
title_short Cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of Ancient Near Eastern legal culture
title_sort cast them out for their many crimes: reading the violent psalmist as part of ancient near eastern legal culture
topic Psalms
Hebrew Bible
Law
Crime
Punishment
Talion
Shame
Honour
Retribution
Theology
Law and Literature
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37432/