Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases

Objective: To perform a systematic review of studies describing paediatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs) conducted from national pharmacovigilance databases. Methods: A systematic literature search of studies describing results for paediatric ADRs from national pharmacovigilance databases was per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cliff-Eribo, Kennedy Obebi, Sammons, Helen, Choonara, Imti
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37181/
_version_ 1848795408000614400
author Cliff-Eribo, Kennedy Obebi
Sammons, Helen
Choonara, Imti
author_facet Cliff-Eribo, Kennedy Obebi
Sammons, Helen
Choonara, Imti
author_sort Cliff-Eribo, Kennedy Obebi
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: To perform a systematic review of studies describing paediatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs) conducted from national pharmacovigilance databases. Methods: A systematic literature search of studies describing results for paediatric ADRs from national pharmacovigilance databases was performed. PubMed database, Embase and MEDLINE were searched up to March 2015. The descriptive studies included were analysed for country of origin, reporters, and ADR reporting rate, drugs, ADRs and number of fatalities. Results: 20 studies were identified. Doctors were the largest group of reporters in all the studies, and with more consumer reports seen in USA. The studies ranged from 3 – 37 years. The highest ADR reporting rate was 1458 reports per year per million children in Cuba. Antibiotics and vaccines were the most frequently reported drugs, in almost all the studies. The most frequent ADRs were skin and nervous system disorders. The highest proportion of fatalities and serious reports was from North America. Drugs used for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and isotretinoin were the most frequently reported drugs for ADRs in North America. Conclusions: There were geographical differences in drugs responsible for ADRs and their seriousness, especially in North America. Very few studies were conducted in Asia and Latin America, none were found from Africa.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:31:36Z
format Article
id nottingham-37181
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:31:36Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-371812020-05-04T18:06:14Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37181/ Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases Cliff-Eribo, Kennedy Obebi Sammons, Helen Choonara, Imti Objective: To perform a systematic review of studies describing paediatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs) conducted from national pharmacovigilance databases. Methods: A systematic literature search of studies describing results for paediatric ADRs from national pharmacovigilance databases was performed. PubMed database, Embase and MEDLINE were searched up to March 2015. The descriptive studies included were analysed for country of origin, reporters, and ADR reporting rate, drugs, ADRs and number of fatalities. Results: 20 studies were identified. Doctors were the largest group of reporters in all the studies, and with more consumer reports seen in USA. The studies ranged from 3 – 37 years. The highest ADR reporting rate was 1458 reports per year per million children in Cuba. Antibiotics and vaccines were the most frequently reported drugs, in almost all the studies. The most frequent ADRs were skin and nervous system disorders. The highest proportion of fatalities and serious reports was from North America. Drugs used for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and isotretinoin were the most frequently reported drugs for ADRs in North America. Conclusions: There were geographical differences in drugs responsible for ADRs and their seriousness, especially in North America. Very few studies were conducted in Asia and Latin America, none were found from Africa. Taylor & Francis Group 2016-08-22 Article PeerReviewed Cliff-Eribo, Kennedy Obebi, Sammons, Helen and Choonara, Imti (2016) Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety . pp. 1321-1328. ISSN 1744-764X Adverse drug reactions paediatric spontaneous reporting system pharmacovigilance database http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14740338.2016.1221921 doi:10.1080/14740338.2016.1221921 doi:10.1080/14740338.2016.1221921
spellingShingle Adverse drug reactions
paediatric
spontaneous reporting system
pharmacovigilance database
Cliff-Eribo, Kennedy Obebi
Sammons, Helen
Choonara, Imti
Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases
title Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases
title_full Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases
title_fullStr Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases
title_short Systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases
title_sort systematic review of paediatric studies of adverse drug reactions from pharmacovigilance databases
topic Adverse drug reactions
paediatric
spontaneous reporting system
pharmacovigilance database
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37181/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37181/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37181/