Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy

The current emphasis on obstetric risk management helps to frame gestational weight gain as problematic and encourages intervention by healthcare professionals. However pregnant women have reported confusion, distrust, and negative affect associated with antenatal weight management interactions. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Swift, Judy Anne, Pearce, Joanne, Jethwa, P.H., Taylor, Moira A., Avery, Amanda, Ellis, Sarah, Langley-Evans, Simon C., McMullen, Sarah
Format: Article
Published: Hindawi 2016
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37098/
_version_ 1848795391981518848
author Swift, Judy Anne
Pearce, Joanne
Jethwa, P.H.
Taylor, Moira A.
Avery, Amanda
Ellis, Sarah
Langley-Evans, Simon C.
McMullen, Sarah
author_facet Swift, Judy Anne
Pearce, Joanne
Jethwa, P.H.
Taylor, Moira A.
Avery, Amanda
Ellis, Sarah
Langley-Evans, Simon C.
McMullen, Sarah
author_sort Swift, Judy Anne
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description The current emphasis on obstetric risk management helps to frame gestational weight gain as problematic and encourages intervention by healthcare professionals. However pregnant women have reported confusion, distrust, and negative affect associated with antenatal weight management interactions. The MAGIC study (MAnaging weiGht In pregnanCy) sought to examine women’s self-reported experiences of usual-care antenatal weight management in early pregnancy, and consider these alongside weight monitoring behaviours and future expectations. 193 women (18yrs+) were recruited from routine antenatal clinics at the Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust. Self-reported gestation was 10-27 weeks, with 41.5% (n=80) between 12-14 and 43.0% (n=83) between 20-22 weeks. At recruitment 50.3% of participants (n=97) could be classified as overweight or obese. 69.4% of highest weight women (≥30kg/m2) did not report receiving advice about weight, although they were significantly more likely to compared to women with BMI<30kg/m2. The majority of women (regardless of BMI) did not express any barriers to being weighed and 40.8% reported weighing themselves at home. Women across the BMI categories expressed a desire for more engagement from healthcare professionals on the issue of bodyweight. Women are clearly not being served appropriately in the current situation which simultaneously problematizes and fails to offer constructive dialogue.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:31:21Z
format Article
id nottingham-37098
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:31:21Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-370982024-08-15T15:20:17Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37098/ Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy Swift, Judy Anne Pearce, Joanne Jethwa, P.H. Taylor, Moira A. Avery, Amanda Ellis, Sarah Langley-Evans, Simon C. McMullen, Sarah The current emphasis on obstetric risk management helps to frame gestational weight gain as problematic and encourages intervention by healthcare professionals. However pregnant women have reported confusion, distrust, and negative affect associated with antenatal weight management interactions. The MAGIC study (MAnaging weiGht In pregnanCy) sought to examine women’s self-reported experiences of usual-care antenatal weight management in early pregnancy, and consider these alongside weight monitoring behaviours and future expectations. 193 women (18yrs+) were recruited from routine antenatal clinics at the Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust. Self-reported gestation was 10-27 weeks, with 41.5% (n=80) between 12-14 and 43.0% (n=83) between 20-22 weeks. At recruitment 50.3% of participants (n=97) could be classified as overweight or obese. 69.4% of highest weight women (≥30kg/m2) did not report receiving advice about weight, although they were significantly more likely to compared to women with BMI<30kg/m2. The majority of women (regardless of BMI) did not express any barriers to being weighed and 40.8% reported weighing themselves at home. Women across the BMI categories expressed a desire for more engagement from healthcare professionals on the issue of bodyweight. Women are clearly not being served appropriately in the current situation which simultaneously problematizes and fails to offer constructive dialogue. Hindawi 2016-09-19 Article PeerReviewed Swift, Judy Anne, Pearce, Joanne, Jethwa, P.H., Taylor, Moira A., Avery, Amanda, Ellis, Sarah, Langley-Evans, Simon C. and McMullen, Sarah (2016) Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy. Journal of Pregnancy . 8454759/1-8454759/14. ISSN 2090-2735 (In Press)
spellingShingle Swift, Judy Anne
Pearce, Joanne
Jethwa, P.H.
Taylor, Moira A.
Avery, Amanda
Ellis, Sarah
Langley-Evans, Simon C.
McMullen, Sarah
Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy
title Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy
title_full Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy
title_fullStr Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy
title_short Antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy
title_sort antenatal weight management: women’s experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/37098/