A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children

Background: Systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis show home safety education with or without the provision of safety equipment is effective in promoting poison prevention behaviours in households with children. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety interventions to promo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Achana, Felix, Sutton, Alex J., Kendrick, Denise, Hayes, Mike, Jones, David R., Hubbard, Stephanie J., Cooper, Nicola J.
Format: Article
Published: BioMed Central 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35990/
_version_ 1848795204043145216
author Achana, Felix
Sutton, Alex J.
Kendrick, Denise
Hayes, Mike
Jones, David R.
Hubbard, Stephanie J.
Cooper, Nicola J.
author_facet Achana, Felix
Sutton, Alex J.
Kendrick, Denise
Hayes, Mike
Jones, David R.
Hubbard, Stephanie J.
Cooper, Nicola J.
author_sort Achana, Felix
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis show home safety education with or without the provision of safety equipment is effective in promoting poison prevention behaviours in households with children. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety interventions to promote poison prevention practices. Methods: A probabilistic decision-analytic model simulates healthcare costs and benefits for a hypothetical cohort of under 5 year olds. The model compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety education, home safety inspections, provision of free or low cost safety equipment and fitting of equipment. Analyses are conducted from a UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective and expressed in 2012 prices. Results: Education without safety inspection, provision or fitting of equipment was the most cost-effective strategy for promoting safe storage of medicines with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2888 (95 % credible interval (CrI) £1990–£5774) per poison case avoided or £41,330 (95%CrI £20,007–£91,534) per QALY gained compared with usual care. Compared to usual care, home safety interventions were not cost-effective in promoting safe storage of other household products. Conclusion: Education offers better value for money than more intensive but expensive strategies for preventing medicinal poisonings, but is only likely to be cost-effective at £30,000 per QALY gained for families in disadvantaged areas and for those with more than one child. There was considerable uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates due to paucity of evidence on model parameters. Policy makers should consider both costs and effectiveness of competing interventions to ensure efficient use of resources.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:28:22Z
format Article
id nottingham-35990
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:28:22Z
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-359902020-05-04T18:07:50Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35990/ A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children Achana, Felix Sutton, Alex J. Kendrick, Denise Hayes, Mike Jones, David R. Hubbard, Stephanie J. Cooper, Nicola J. Background: Systematic reviews and a network meta-analysis show home safety education with or without the provision of safety equipment is effective in promoting poison prevention behaviours in households with children. This paper compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety interventions to promote poison prevention practices. Methods: A probabilistic decision-analytic model simulates healthcare costs and benefits for a hypothetical cohort of under 5 year olds. The model compares the cost-effectiveness of home safety education, home safety inspections, provision of free or low cost safety equipment and fitting of equipment. Analyses are conducted from a UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective and expressed in 2012 prices. Results: Education without safety inspection, provision or fitting of equipment was the most cost-effective strategy for promoting safe storage of medicines with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2888 (95 % credible interval (CrI) £1990–£5774) per poison case avoided or £41,330 (95%CrI £20,007–£91,534) per QALY gained compared with usual care. Compared to usual care, home safety interventions were not cost-effective in promoting safe storage of other household products. Conclusion: Education offers better value for money than more intensive but expensive strategies for preventing medicinal poisonings, but is only likely to be cost-effective at £30,000 per QALY gained for families in disadvantaged areas and for those with more than one child. There was considerable uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates due to paucity of evidence on model parameters. Policy makers should consider both costs and effectiveness of competing interventions to ensure efficient use of resources. BioMed Central 2016-08-03 Article PeerReviewed Achana, Felix, Sutton, Alex J., Kendrick, Denise, Hayes, Mike, Jones, David R., Hubbard, Stephanie J. and Cooper, Nicola J. (2016) A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children. BMC Public Health, 16 . 705/1-705/17. ISSN 1471-2458 Economic evaluation; Public health; Injury prevention; Poisonings; Children; Decision models http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3334-0 doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3334-0 doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3334-0
spellingShingle Economic evaluation; Public health; Injury prevention; Poisonings; Children; Decision models
Achana, Felix
Sutton, Alex J.
Kendrick, Denise
Hayes, Mike
Jones, David R.
Hubbard, Stephanie J.
Cooper, Nicola J.
A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_full A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_fullStr A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_full_unstemmed A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_short A decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
title_sort decision analytic model to investigate the cost-effectiveness of poisoning prevention practices in households with young children
topic Economic evaluation; Public health; Injury prevention; Poisonings; Children; Decision models
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35990/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35990/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35990/