Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice

This study addresses creativity and innovation literatures and explores the necessity for creativity in the implementation of service innovations in the English National Health Service. In doing so, it examines whether the standard definition of creativity (Stein 1953; Runco and Jaeger, 2012) is suf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gordon, Shaun MacGregor
Format: Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35883/
_version_ 1848795181757759488
author Gordon, Shaun MacGregor
author_facet Gordon, Shaun MacGregor
author_sort Gordon, Shaun MacGregor
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description This study addresses creativity and innovation literatures and explores the necessity for creativity in the implementation of service innovations in the English National Health Service. In doing so, it examines whether the standard definition of creativity (Stein 1953; Runco and Jaeger, 2012) is sufficient to explain the workplace creative practices associated with the implementation of a service innovation through the replication of best practice. Based on a qualitative research design, and using a critical realist approach (Bhaskar, 1975/2008, 1998), this research unearths a rich seam of empirical data through observations and semi-structured interviews in an English National Health Service primary care organisation, known as a NHS Clinical Commissioning Group (NHS CCG). Although human creativity is an essential ingredient of any successful innovation, characterised by individuals and teams having ‘good ideas’ (Amabile et al, 1996), creativity has a crucial role in the development of new services (Zeng, Proctor and Salvendy, 2009). However, it is noted that there have been relatively few recent empirical studies of creativity in service innovation (Giannopoulou, Gryszkiewicz and Barlatier, 2014), and in particular in the public sector. Thus models of organisational innovation remain virtually unchanged over the last three decades (Anderson, Potočnik and Zhou, 2014), and have not attempted to account for creativity and service innovation in the English NHS. The thesis makes a number of contributions to creativity and innovation literatures. It also provides some understanding of creativity and service innovation in a public sector health service context. First, the study provides empirical evidence for human creativity when new services are introduced through the replication of workplace practice from another geographical location or organisation. This means that the current understandings of creativity, which are focused on creativity as a teleological outcome, driving the production of novelty, for example a creative product, need to be modified to account for novelty in a new context. Accordingly, a definition of creativity which accounts for contextual novelty is presented. Second, the research study also contributes to existing knowledge by illuminating the creative practices of workers tasked with implementing service innovations. Hitherto, creativity research has focused attention on the importance of creativity in the earlier ideation stage of the innovation process (for example, West, 2002a). The empirical evidence presented in this thesis demonstrates that creative practices are also necessary at the back end of the service innovation process, and may be driven by human reflexivity, rather than more formal organisational structures, such as ideation workshops. Third, there is a contribution to both creativity and service innovation literatures. These literatures are influenced by stage-gate models of innovation, with an ideation stage followed by an implementation stage. This research study suggests that future approaches to service innovation should embrace the innovation process as a whole social process rather than be separated into discrete segments. A final contribution relates directly to the context of the research study. The English NHS is one of the world’s largest employers, with strategic guidance provided by the Department of Health, and operational training and developmental needs met by NHS England. However, this top-down approach has not stifled the capacity of its workforce to problematise issues arising during the implementation of service innovations, even though there is a lack of purposeful guidance on how to do this. Instead, with the support of the local clinical and managerial leadership, front-line staff are able to address difficulties requiring creativity as they arose, drawing, primarily, on their reflexivity. Further, while the workforce is being creative, it is not associating their practices with creativity. Consequently, people lack a discourse of creativity, which would otherwise make further calls on their reflexivity, and positively impact on their productivity.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:28:01Z
format Thesis (University of Nottingham only)
id nottingham-35883
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:28:01Z
publishDate 2016
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-358832025-02-28T11:50:31Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35883/ Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice Gordon, Shaun MacGregor This study addresses creativity and innovation literatures and explores the necessity for creativity in the implementation of service innovations in the English National Health Service. In doing so, it examines whether the standard definition of creativity (Stein 1953; Runco and Jaeger, 2012) is sufficient to explain the workplace creative practices associated with the implementation of a service innovation through the replication of best practice. Based on a qualitative research design, and using a critical realist approach (Bhaskar, 1975/2008, 1998), this research unearths a rich seam of empirical data through observations and semi-structured interviews in an English National Health Service primary care organisation, known as a NHS Clinical Commissioning Group (NHS CCG). Although human creativity is an essential ingredient of any successful innovation, characterised by individuals and teams having ‘good ideas’ (Amabile et al, 1996), creativity has a crucial role in the development of new services (Zeng, Proctor and Salvendy, 2009). However, it is noted that there have been relatively few recent empirical studies of creativity in service innovation (Giannopoulou, Gryszkiewicz and Barlatier, 2014), and in particular in the public sector. Thus models of organisational innovation remain virtually unchanged over the last three decades (Anderson, Potočnik and Zhou, 2014), and have not attempted to account for creativity and service innovation in the English NHS. The thesis makes a number of contributions to creativity and innovation literatures. It also provides some understanding of creativity and service innovation in a public sector health service context. First, the study provides empirical evidence for human creativity when new services are introduced through the replication of workplace practice from another geographical location or organisation. This means that the current understandings of creativity, which are focused on creativity as a teleological outcome, driving the production of novelty, for example a creative product, need to be modified to account for novelty in a new context. Accordingly, a definition of creativity which accounts for contextual novelty is presented. Second, the research study also contributes to existing knowledge by illuminating the creative practices of workers tasked with implementing service innovations. Hitherto, creativity research has focused attention on the importance of creativity in the earlier ideation stage of the innovation process (for example, West, 2002a). The empirical evidence presented in this thesis demonstrates that creative practices are also necessary at the back end of the service innovation process, and may be driven by human reflexivity, rather than more formal organisational structures, such as ideation workshops. Third, there is a contribution to both creativity and service innovation literatures. These literatures are influenced by stage-gate models of innovation, with an ideation stage followed by an implementation stage. This research study suggests that future approaches to service innovation should embrace the innovation process as a whole social process rather than be separated into discrete segments. A final contribution relates directly to the context of the research study. The English NHS is one of the world’s largest employers, with strategic guidance provided by the Department of Health, and operational training and developmental needs met by NHS England. However, this top-down approach has not stifled the capacity of its workforce to problematise issues arising during the implementation of service innovations, even though there is a lack of purposeful guidance on how to do this. Instead, with the support of the local clinical and managerial leadership, front-line staff are able to address difficulties requiring creativity as they arose, drawing, primarily, on their reflexivity. Further, while the workforce is being creative, it is not associating their practices with creativity. Consequently, people lack a discourse of creativity, which would otherwise make further calls on their reflexivity, and positively impact on their productivity. 2016-12-14 Thesis (University of Nottingham only) NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en arr https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35883/1/Shaun%20Gordon%20-%204144993%20-%20PhD%20Thesis%20-%20August%202016%20-%20final.pdf Gordon, Shaun MacGregor (2016) Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. creativity innovation nhs national health service
spellingShingle creativity
innovation
nhs
national health service
Gordon, Shaun MacGregor
Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice
title Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice
title_full Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice
title_fullStr Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice
title_full_unstemmed Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice
title_short Creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice
title_sort creativity and service innovation: an examination of differences between theory and practice
topic creativity
innovation
nhs
national health service
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35883/