The future as a design problem

An often unacknowledged yet foundational problem for design is how ‘futures‘ are recruited for design practice. This problem saturates considerations of what could or should be designed. We distinguish two intertwined approaches to this: ‘pragmatic projection’, which tries to tie the future to the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart, Reeves, Murray, Goulden, Robert, Dingwall
Format: Article
Published: MIT Press 2016
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35604/
_version_ 1848795119322398720
author Stuart, Reeves
Murray, Goulden
Robert, Dingwall
author_facet Stuart, Reeves
Murray, Goulden
Robert, Dingwall
author_sort Stuart, Reeves
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description An often unacknowledged yet foundational problem for design is how ‘futures‘ are recruited for design practice. This problem saturates considerations of what could or should be designed. We distinguish two intertwined approaches to this: ‘pragmatic projection’, which tries to tie the future to the past, and ‘grand vision’, which ties the present to the future. We examine ubiquitous computing as a case study of how pragmatic projection and grand vision are practically expressed to direct and structure design decisions. We assess their implications and conclude by arguing that the social legitimacy of design futures should be increasingly integral to their construction.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:27:01Z
format Article
id nottingham-35604
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:27:01Z
publishDate 2016
publisher MIT Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-356042020-05-04T18:01:33Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35604/ The future as a design problem Stuart, Reeves Murray, Goulden Robert, Dingwall An often unacknowledged yet foundational problem for design is how ‘futures‘ are recruited for design practice. This problem saturates considerations of what could or should be designed. We distinguish two intertwined approaches to this: ‘pragmatic projection’, which tries to tie the future to the past, and ‘grand vision’, which ties the present to the future. We examine ubiquitous computing as a case study of how pragmatic projection and grand vision are practically expressed to direct and structure design decisions. We assess their implications and conclude by arguing that the social legitimacy of design futures should be increasingly integral to their construction. MIT Press 2016-07-14 Article PeerReviewed Stuart, Reeves, Murray, Goulden and Robert, Dingwall (2016) The future as a design problem. Design Issues, 32 (3). pp. 6-17. ISSN 1531-4790 http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/DESI_a_00395#.V586R6KAe5o doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00395 doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00395
spellingShingle Stuart, Reeves
Murray, Goulden
Robert, Dingwall
The future as a design problem
title The future as a design problem
title_full The future as a design problem
title_fullStr The future as a design problem
title_full_unstemmed The future as a design problem
title_short The future as a design problem
title_sort future as a design problem
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35604/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35604/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35604/