Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems

A large number of heuristic algorithms have been developed over the years which have been aimed at solving examination timetabling problems. However, many of these algorithms have been developed specifically to solve one particular problem instance or a small subset of instances related to a given r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burke, Edmund, Eckersley, Adam, McCollum, Barry, Petrovic, Sanja, Qu, Rong
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: 2003
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/355/
_version_ 1848790398845059072
author Burke, Edmund
Eckersley, Adam
McCollum, Barry
Petrovic, Sanja
Qu, Rong
author_facet Burke, Edmund
Eckersley, Adam
McCollum, Barry
Petrovic, Sanja
Qu, Rong
author_sort Burke, Edmund
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description A large number of heuristic algorithms have been developed over the years which have been aimed at solving examination timetabling problems. However, many of these algorithms have been developed specifically to solve one particular problem instance or a small subset of instances related to a given real-life problem. Our aim is to develop a more general system which, when given any exam timetabling problem, will produce results which are comparative to those of a specially designed heuristic for that problem. We are investigating a Case based reasoning (CBR) technique to select from a set of algorithms which have been applied successfully to similar problem instances in the past. The assumption in CBR is that similar problems have similar solutions. For our system, the assumption is that an algorithm used to find a good solution to one problem will also produce a good result for a similar problem. The key to the success of the system will be our definition of similarity between two exam timetabling problems. The study will be carried out by running a series of tests using a simple Simulated Annealing Algorithm on a range of problems with differing levels of similarity and examining the data sets in detail. In this paper an initial investigation of the key factors which will be involved in this measure is presented with a discussion of how the definition of good impacts on this.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T18:11:59Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id nottingham-355
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T18:11:59Z
publishDate 2003
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-3552020-05-04T20:32:00Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/355/ Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems Burke, Edmund Eckersley, Adam McCollum, Barry Petrovic, Sanja Qu, Rong A large number of heuristic algorithms have been developed over the years which have been aimed at solving examination timetabling problems. However, many of these algorithms have been developed specifically to solve one particular problem instance or a small subset of instances related to a given real-life problem. Our aim is to develop a more general system which, when given any exam timetabling problem, will produce results which are comparative to those of a specially designed heuristic for that problem. We are investigating a Case based reasoning (CBR) technique to select from a set of algorithms which have been applied successfully to similar problem instances in the past. The assumption in CBR is that similar problems have similar solutions. For our system, the assumption is that an algorithm used to find a good solution to one problem will also produce a good result for a similar problem. The key to the success of the system will be our definition of similarity between two exam timetabling problems. The study will be carried out by running a series of tests using a simple Simulated Annealing Algorithm on a range of problems with differing levels of similarity and examining the data sets in detail. In this paper an initial investigation of the key factors which will be involved in this measure is presented with a discussion of how the definition of good impacts on this. 2003 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed Burke, Edmund, Eckersley, Adam, McCollum, Barry, Petrovic, Sanja and Qu, Rong (2003) Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems. In: Multidisciplinary International Conference on Scheduling : Theory and Applications, Aug 2003.
spellingShingle Burke, Edmund
Eckersley, Adam
McCollum, Barry
Petrovic, Sanja
Qu, Rong
Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems
title Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems
title_full Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems
title_fullStr Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems
title_full_unstemmed Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems
title_short Similarity Measures for Exam Timetabling Problems
title_sort similarity measures for exam timetabling problems
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/355/