The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation

Background/Aims: UK occupational therapists are recognised as having key skills in work rehabilitation, but there is limited evidence to underpin this. In order to use research resources to best effect, it is vital to identify the research priorities of occupational therapists in work rehabilitation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coole, Carol, McBean, Juliet, Drummond, Avril E.R.
Format: Article
Published: Mark Allen Healthcare 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35407/
_version_ 1848795069780328448
author Coole, Carol
McBean, Juliet
Drummond, Avril E.R.
author_facet Coole, Carol
McBean, Juliet
Drummond, Avril E.R.
author_sort Coole, Carol
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background/Aims: UK occupational therapists are recognised as having key skills in work rehabilitation, but there is limited evidence to underpin this. In order to use research resources to best effect, it is vital to identify the research priorities of occupational therapists in work rehabilitation. This study aims to gather the views of those with a special interest in the field in order to identify their research priorities. Methods: An online survey was developed and administered electronically to members (n=173) of the College of Occupational Therapists Specialist Section-Work (COTSS-Work). Respondents were asked to: i) prioritise and comment on research areas; ii) propose research questions. A final sample of 42 surveys was collected and analysed thematically Results: Responses reflected the diversity and complexity of work rehabilitation. Identifying a rank order of research priorities proved challenging as the majority (≥62%) of respondents considered all of the topic areas listed a high priority. Research into the following areas were included in the survey: interventions; outcome measurements; assessments; management and/or service delivery; planning and/or commissioning; and education. However, 'interventions' was rated highest overall. Conclusions: Occupational therapists in the UK need more evidence to justify their role in the work and health arena. Greater opportunities are required for occupational therapists in clinical practice, as well as those involved in research, to address areas in which evidence-based practice is lacking and the mechanisms to disseminate this knowledge base.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:26:14Z
format Article
id nottingham-35407
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:26:14Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Mark Allen Healthcare
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-354072020-05-04T17:13:46Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35407/ The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation Coole, Carol McBean, Juliet Drummond, Avril E.R. Background/Aims: UK occupational therapists are recognised as having key skills in work rehabilitation, but there is limited evidence to underpin this. In order to use research resources to best effect, it is vital to identify the research priorities of occupational therapists in work rehabilitation. This study aims to gather the views of those with a special interest in the field in order to identify their research priorities. Methods: An online survey was developed and administered electronically to members (n=173) of the College of Occupational Therapists Specialist Section-Work (COTSS-Work). Respondents were asked to: i) prioritise and comment on research areas; ii) propose research questions. A final sample of 42 surveys was collected and analysed thematically Results: Responses reflected the diversity and complexity of work rehabilitation. Identifying a rank order of research priorities proved challenging as the majority (≥62%) of respondents considered all of the topic areas listed a high priority. Research into the following areas were included in the survey: interventions; outcome measurements; assessments; management and/or service delivery; planning and/or commissioning; and education. However, 'interventions' was rated highest overall. Conclusions: Occupational therapists in the UK need more evidence to justify their role in the work and health arena. Greater opportunities are required for occupational therapists in clinical practice, as well as those involved in research, to address areas in which evidence-based practice is lacking and the mechanisms to disseminate this knowledge base. Mark Allen Healthcare 2015-07-02 Article PeerReviewed Coole, Carol, McBean, Juliet and Drummond, Avril E.R. (2015) The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 22 (7). pp. 329-336. ISSN 1759-779X Work Rehabilitation Research Priorities Survey Occupational Therapy http://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/10.12968/ijtr.2015.22.7.329 doi:10.12968/ijtr.2015.22.7.329 doi:10.12968/ijtr.2015.22.7.329
spellingShingle Work Rehabilitation
Research Priorities
Survey
Occupational Therapy
Coole, Carol
McBean, Juliet
Drummond, Avril E.R.
The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation
title The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation
title_full The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation
title_fullStr The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation
title_short The identification of research priorities for UK occupational therapists in work rehabilitation
title_sort identification of research priorities for uk occupational therapists in work rehabilitation
topic Work Rehabilitation
Research Priorities
Survey
Occupational Therapy
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35407/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35407/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35407/