Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers

Background: GPs can use the fit note to advise that a patient ‘may be fit’ or is ‘not fit’ for work. Previous employer-based research on the fit note is largely qualitative and based on general perceptions and past experience. Knowledge of the return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coole, Carol, Potgieter, Iskra, Nouri, Fiona, Worthington, Esme, Drummond, Avril
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35402/
_version_ 1848795068907913216
author Coole, Carol
Potgieter, Iskra
Nouri, Fiona
Worthington, Esme
Drummond, Avril
author_facet Coole, Carol
Potgieter, Iskra
Nouri, Fiona
Worthington, Esme
Drummond, Avril
author_sort Coole, Carol
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: GPs can use the fit note to advise that a patient ‘may be fit’ or is ‘not fit’ for work. Previous employer-based research on the fit note is largely qualitative and based on general perceptions and past experience. Knowledge of the return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes is needed to strengthen the evidence-base and inform practice. Objective: To investigate the return-to-work outcomes of fit notes issued to employed patients, and their employers’ opinions as to the usefulness of each note. Methods: Participating organizations collecting fit notes were asked to rate the outcome and usefulness of each fit note via postal questionnaires. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; qualitative data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: Five hundred and sixteen questionnaires were posted, with a 97% return rate (n = 498). More than 80% of employees (n = 44) returned to work after the expiry date of a ‘may be fit’ note compared with 43% (n = 167) of those issued with a ‘not fit’ note. Fit notes were considered more useful if they provided information on the condition and its effect on the employee’s ability to work, if they stated whether or not the employee needed reassessment and if clear advice regarding return-to-work had been provided. Conclusions: ‘May be fit’ notes are useful in helping employees return to work. However, this option is infrequently used, and the completion and content of many fit notes does not meet employers’ needs. These factors need to be urgently addressed if the fit note is to reach its full potential.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:26:13Z
format Article
id nottingham-35402
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:26:13Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-354022020-05-04T17:09:54Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35402/ Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers Coole, Carol Potgieter, Iskra Nouri, Fiona Worthington, Esme Drummond, Avril Background: GPs can use the fit note to advise that a patient ‘may be fit’ or is ‘not fit’ for work. Previous employer-based research on the fit note is largely qualitative and based on general perceptions and past experience. Knowledge of the return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes is needed to strengthen the evidence-base and inform practice. Objective: To investigate the return-to-work outcomes of fit notes issued to employed patients, and their employers’ opinions as to the usefulness of each note. Methods: Participating organizations collecting fit notes were asked to rate the outcome and usefulness of each fit note via postal questionnaires. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; qualitative data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: Five hundred and sixteen questionnaires were posted, with a 97% return rate (n = 498). More than 80% of employees (n = 44) returned to work after the expiry date of a ‘may be fit’ note compared with 43% (n = 167) of those issued with a ‘not fit’ note. Fit notes were considered more useful if they provided information on the condition and its effect on the employee’s ability to work, if they stated whether or not the employee needed reassessment and if clear advice regarding return-to-work had been provided. Conclusions: ‘May be fit’ notes are useful in helping employees return to work. However, this option is infrequently used, and the completion and content of many fit notes does not meet employers’ needs. These factors need to be urgently addressed if the fit note is to reach its full potential. Oxford University Press 2015-06-26 Article PeerReviewed Coole, Carol, Potgieter, Iskra, Nouri, Fiona, Worthington, Esme and Drummond, Avril (2015) Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers. Family Practice, 32 (5). pp. 551-556. ISSN 1460-2229 consultation occupational/environmental medicine primary care public health rehabilitation/disabilities http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/content/32/5/551 doi:10.1093/fampra/cmv050 doi:10.1093/fampra/cmv050
spellingShingle consultation
occupational/environmental medicine
primary care
public health
rehabilitation/disabilities
Coole, Carol
Potgieter, Iskra
Nouri, Fiona
Worthington, Esme
Drummond, Avril
Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers
title Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers
title_full Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers
title_fullStr Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers
title_full_unstemmed Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers
title_short Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers
title_sort return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers
topic consultation
occupational/environmental medicine
primary care
public health
rehabilitation/disabilities
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35402/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35402/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/35402/