Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK

It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prochorskaite, Agne, Couch, Chris, Malys, Naglis, Maliene, Vida
Format: Article
Published: MDPI 2016
Online Access:https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34656/
_version_ 1848794904281481216
author Prochorskaite, Agne
Couch, Chris
Malys, Naglis
Maliene, Vida
author_facet Prochorskaite, Agne
Couch, Chris
Malys, Naglis
Maliene, Vida
author_sort Prochorskaite, Agne
building Nottingham Research Data Repository
collection Online Access
description It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being of its users. This paper focuses on the “soft” features of sustainable housing, that is, the non-technological components of sustainable housing and neighbourhood design that can impact occupants’ health and well-being. Aims of the study are to ascertain the relative level of importance that key housing stakeholders attach to these features and to investigate whether the opinions of housing users and housing providers are aligned with regards to their importance. An online survey was carried out to gauge the level of importance that the key stakeholders, such as housing users, local authorities, housing associations, and developers (n = 235), attach to these features. Results revealed that while suitable indoor space was the feature regarded as most important by all stakeholders, there were also a number of disparities in opinion between housing users and housing providers (and among the different types of providers). This implies a scope for initiatives to achieve a better alignment between housing users and providers.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T19:23:36Z
format Article
id nottingham-34656
institution University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T19:23:36Z
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling nottingham-346562020-05-04T17:33:10Z https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34656/ Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK Prochorskaite, Agne Couch, Chris Malys, Naglis Maliene, Vida It is widely recognised that the quantity and sustainability of new homes in the UK need to increase. However, it is important that sustainable housing is regarded holistically, and not merely in environmental terms, and incorporates elements that enhance the quality of life, health and well-being of its users. This paper focuses on the “soft” features of sustainable housing, that is, the non-technological components of sustainable housing and neighbourhood design that can impact occupants’ health and well-being. Aims of the study are to ascertain the relative level of importance that key housing stakeholders attach to these features and to investigate whether the opinions of housing users and housing providers are aligned with regards to their importance. An online survey was carried out to gauge the level of importance that the key stakeholders, such as housing users, local authorities, housing associations, and developers (n = 235), attach to these features. Results revealed that while suitable indoor space was the feature regarded as most important by all stakeholders, there were also a number of disparities in opinion between housing users and housing providers (and among the different types of providers). This implies a scope for initiatives to achieve a better alignment between housing users and providers. MDPI 2016-01-07 Article PeerReviewed Prochorskaite, Agne, Couch, Chris, Malys, Naglis and Maliene, Vida (2016) Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13 (1). p. 111. ISSN 1660-4601 http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/1/111 doi:10.3390/ijerph13010111 doi:10.3390/ijerph13010111
spellingShingle Prochorskaite, Agne
Couch, Chris
Malys, Naglis
Maliene, Vida
Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK
title Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK
title_full Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK
title_fullStr Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK
title_short Housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the UK
title_sort housing stakeholder preferences for the “soft” features of sustainable and healthy housing design in the uk
url https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34656/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34656/
https://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/34656/